This paper looks a bit sketchy.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Menaus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bit Paper
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion critically evaluates Wolfgang Engelhardt's paper "Instantaneous Interaction between Charged Particles," submitted to Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie. The paper is deemed to violate principles of Special Relativity and lacks a rigorous peer review process. Key issues include the misuse of Maxwell's equations and the incorrect interpretation of electromagnetic wave propagation. The discussion highlights that the author's claims are unsupported by standard physics principles and cites an unverified paper as experimental evidence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Special Relativity principles
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Basic concepts of peer review in scientific publishing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the validity of Maxwell's equations in modern physics
  • Explore the implications of Special Relativity on electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate the peer review process in scientific journals
  • Examine the Biot-Savart Law and its applications in electromagnetism
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in electromagnetism, students studying Special Relativity, and anyone interested in the peer review process of scientific literature.

Menaus
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0511172v2

"Instantaneous Interaction between Charged Particles" by Wolfgang Engelhardt

Submitted to Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie

Has this paper undergone a good process of peer review? It seems in violation of Special Relativity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Even if it does get published, I wouldn't call the Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie a research journal. As it stands, I think this article doesn't meet the criteria for discussion on PF.
 
The paper is careless in its exposition. The idea that Maxwell's equations and conservation of energy require instantaneous propagation of force is most probably wrong.

The equations in (1) are not standard wave equations with charge and current source terms, but instead some part of the field is used as a source. Then the source is distributed in the whole space and this precludes simple interpretation of ##E_w## as EM wave propagating with speed ##c## from charged body.

The examples with the charge and current loop do not support author's claim in any way. The field is often treated as instantaneous function of charge and current distribution not because the field propagates instantaneously, but because the difference from the correct retarded field is negligible for slowly oscillating currents.
 
Hmmm... This article cites a paper as experimental evidence.

"Experimental Evidence on Non-Applicability of the Standard Retardation Condition to Bound Magnetic Fields and on New Generalized Biot-Savart Law"

http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0601084

I has not been published by anyone.

This is a larger one, i'll have to look at it later.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K