Time Dilation: Impact on GPS Accuracy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of time dilation on GPS accuracy for a hypothetical scenario where a plane travels at 0.99 times the speed of light (C) around the Earth. Participants explore the theoretical aspects of time dilation, Doppler shifts, and the mechanics of GPS signal reception under extreme conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the precision of GPS at high speeds, suggesting that time dilation affects the accuracy of the GPS readings.
  • Another participant highlights the potential for a significant Doppler shift in signals due to the high velocity, which could prevent the GPS receiver from functioning correctly.
  • Concerns are raised about the synchronization of clocks between the GPS satellites and the receiver, with one participant noting that the receiver's clock would run slower, complicating position calculations.
  • It is mentioned that even if corrections for time differences were made, the information received would be outdated by the time it reached the plane due to the speed of travel.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express skepticism about the GPS system's ability to provide accurate readings at such high speeds, with multiple competing views on the specific reasons for this inaccuracy, including Doppler effects and clock synchronization issues. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the theoretical functioning of GPS under these conditions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the complexities involved in the interaction of time dilation, signal transmission delays, and the operational limits of GPS technology at relativistic speeds.

nordqvist11
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hey there guys I just have a question to ask some of you. Given the occurrence of time dilation being related to an objects state of motion I have an interesting thought.

This is a very general question, my teacher only briefly covered this topic in class as it's not part of our course but it intrigued me. If I am traveling at a speed of .99 C in a plane around the Earth and I am hooked up to a GPS which shows me my location on the map in my plane, relevant to my position in an instantaneous moment would the GPS be precise?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


I think you mean time dilation? I have never heard of time distillation before. And I believe yes but someone correct me if I am wrong
 
Your plane will be circling the Earth about eight orbits per second...
To do that your plane will need to point almost to the center of the Earth and your direction of motion will be almost perpendicular to the floor of the plane in the cabin roof direction ("up" from your seat).
This will make for some peculiar effects:
A phenomenal G force directed to the rear of the plane ("back" into your seat).
An orbit frequency making GPS too fast to read by eye
Length contraction of the Earth in the vertical (floor to ceiling) corresponding to the latitudinal direction of the Earth (if your plane is in an equatorial orbit).
Also, if you used a high speed camera or computer link to read the GPS display, the delay in transmission of signal would be a not insignificant contribution to measurement error.

But all these things aside, as a thought problem, I think the actual GPS system is supposed to work in theory even under these extremes.
 
nordqvist11 said:
Hey there guys I just have a question to ask some of you. Given the occurrence of time dilation being related to an objects state of motion I have an interesting thought.

This is a very general question, my teacher only briefly covered this topic in class as it's not part of our course but it intrigued me.


If I am traveling at a speed of .99 C in a plane around the Earth and I am hooked up to a GPS which shows me my location on the map in my plane, relevant to my position in an instantaneous moment would the GPS be precise?

No. For one, a normal GPS would likely not even work. Your high velocity with respect to the satellites would cause a large Doppler shift in the signals to the point that would your GPS receiver would not pick them up.

Secondly, Your receiver clock would be running much slower than the GPS clock. Since calculation of position requires a comparison between receiver clock and the time index it receives from the satellite and then using difference between these times and the speed of light to tell how far the receiver is from the satellite, and this requires both clocks to run at the same rate, you would not get an accurate answer.

and Third, even if you corrected for this time rate difference, by the time you got the information that you were x kilometers from satellite n, the information would be obsolete. It would take a minimum of .067 sec for the signal to reach you, by which time you will have moved almost 20,000 km, or ~1/2 the way around the world.
 
Janus said:
No. For one, a normal GPS would likely not even work. Your high velocity with respect to the satellites would cause a large Doppler shift in the signals to the point that would your GPS receiver would not pick them up.

Secondly, Your receiver clock would be running much slower than the GPS clock. Since calculation of position requires a comparison between receiver clock and the time index it receives from the satellite and then using difference between these times and the speed of light to tell how far the receiver is from the satellite, and this requires both clocks to run at the same rate, you would not get an accurate answer.

and Third, even if you corrected for this time rate difference, by the time you got the information that you were x kilometers from satellite n, the information would be obsolete. It would take a minimum of .067 sec for the signal to reach you, by which time you will have moved almost 20,000 km, or ~1/2 the way around the world.

Really great stuff, thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
6K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K