Is Time Travel Feasible Within the Limits of Light and Atomic Interactions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of time travel within the constraints of light and atomic interactions, sparked by a PBS Space Time episode. The initial claim suggests that "time" is merely an interaction between atoms, which is met with skepticism due to a lack of peer-reviewed support. Participants emphasize the importance of established scientific principles, particularly the invariance of the speed of light (c) and the variability of atomic interactions under different conditions, such as gravitational effects. The thread concludes with a reminder that speculative theories without credible sources are not suitable for discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's Theory of Relativity
  • Familiarity with the concept of the speed of light (c)
  • Knowledge of atomic interactions and their variability
  • Awareness of peer-reviewed scientific standards
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Einstein's Theory of Relativity and its implications on time perception
  • Explore the concept of time dilation in different gravitational fields
  • Investigate peer-reviewed articles on atomic interactions and their effects on time
  • Learn about the scientific method and the importance of peer review in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the scientific principles governing time and atomic interactions.

Andrew0853
I just wanted to share this idea with other people who may be interested:

I watched a PBS Space Time episode about the speed of light more accurately described as the speed of causality.

And I Submit! That "time" is simply a interaction between atoms.

And though an interaction can be reversed, it can never be undone (it has already happened)

Any thoughts are greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Hi Andrew! As you are new, you are not as familiar with the standards here.

Generally speaking, the kind of reference you provided does not follow PhysicsForums guidelines. That is because it is not from a suitable peer-reviewed publication & author.

It would make more sense if you had a specific question about Time. As opposed to making a statement about Time - and one that would be considered speculative at that.
 
Also: you are probably familiar with Relativity. You may not be aware that the speed of atomic interactions varies under various boosts. For example, time appears to elapse more slowly in the interior of the Earth than in the stratosphere. So atomic interactions (as you hypothesize) do not have a single specific duration of time that they define.

What is invariant is c.
 
As @DrChinese pointed out, we do not debunk questionable sources as we do not discuss personal theories which aren't published in peer reviewed scientific journals. Both is affected by this youtube video, so I'll close this thread.

As always, if there is a scientific reliable source that discusses the subject or related ones, please contact me or another mentor and this thread can be re-opened.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K