MHB To find the expectation of the greater of X and Y

  • Thread starter Thread starter Suvadip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expectation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the expectation of the maximum of two correlated normal variables, X and Y, with zero means and unit variances. It confirms that the expectation of the greater of X and Y, denoted as max{X,Y}, is influenced by the correlation coefficient ρ. For independent variables (ρ = 0), the expectation is easily derived as 1/√π. However, when ρ is not zero, deriving the expectation becomes more complex, and a general formula exists for such cases. The conversation seeks clarity on whether a full derivation is needed and the context of the problem.
Suvadip
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
If $$(X, Y)$$ has the normal distribution in two dimensions with zero means and unit variances and correlation coefficient $$\rho$$, then to prove that the expectation of the greater of X and Y is $$\sqrt{(1-\rho)\pi}$$.

How to proceed with it? Help please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly do you mean with the greater of $X$ and $Y$? I suppose $\max\{X,Y\}$?

When $(X,Y)$ has a bivariate normal distribution it follows that $X$ and $Y$ are normally distributed (in this case with zero means and unit variances). The correlation coefficient describes the dependency structure between $X$ and $Y$. If $X$ and $Y$ are independent, in other words $\rho = 0$, then it's not very difficult to derive that
$$\mathbb{E}[\max\{X,Y\}] = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}}$$.

However when $\rho \neq 0$ then it's harder to derive an expression for the expectation but there's a general formula. So before I proceed I have three questions: Do you want a full derivation of the general formula? Where does this problem come from? What have you already tried?
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top