Topological Objects: Understanding Their Physical Interest

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stephenhky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topological
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the physical interest of topological objects, exploring the reasons behind their significance in physics. Participants are invited to share their thoughts on this topic, which touches on theoretical and conceptual aspects of topological phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that topological objects are interesting due to the high energy required to nucleate or annihilate them compared to non-topological excitations.
  • This participant also notes that conservation laws allow for continuous deformation of the order parameter field without changing the system's topology, implying that non-topological excitations can be induced more easily.
  • Another participant expresses a desire for a clearer explanation of the reasons behind the physical interest in topological objects, indicating a need for more detailed discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There appears to be no consensus yet, as participants are still sharing their views and seeking clarification on the topic.

Contextual Notes

The discussion may benefit from further exploration of the definitions and implications of topological objects, as well as the specific conservation laws mentioned.

stephenhky
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
What do you think about the reason why topological objects are physically interesting?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stephenhky said:
What do you think about the reason why topological objects are physically interesting?

Tell us "the reason why topological objects are physically interesting" and we will tell you what we think about it.
 
olgranpappy said:
Tell us "the reason why topological objects are physically interesting" and we will tell you what we think about it.

you're not getting genial with that, k?
 
In my mind, topological objects are physically interesting because the energy to nucleate them or annihilate them are large compared to other non-topological excitations.

Because of some conservation laws, the continuous deformation of the order parameter field does not change the topology of the system. Therefore, it is easy to induce a non-topological excitations. To change the topology of the system, more energy and time are needed.

What do you think?
 

Similar threads

Graduate Physics of Topological Insulators and Superconductors
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Graduate Self-Teaching Topological Insulators/Phases/Symmetry
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Graduate Black hole as topological insulator
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Undergrad Topological question from Ashcroft-Mermin
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Graduate Is there any topology behind factor 2 in Schwarzschild radius?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Insights The Many Faces of Topology
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
Studying Need advice for research subjects in both topological and general relativity
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Graduate Topological constrains for the solutions of EFE
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Graduate Help with the Derrick scaling argument and topological solitons
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Graduate Topological Phases: Understanding Kitaev's Paper
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K