Topology: Bijection with Open intervals

Click For Summary
To prove that any two open intervals (a,b) and (c,d) are equivalent, the function f(x) = ((d-c)/(b-a))*(x-a)+c must be shown to be a bijection. This involves demonstrating that f is one-to-one, meaning if f(x) = f(y), then x must equal y, which can be verified through algebraic manipulation. Additionally, to establish that f is onto, it must be shown that for every y in (c,d), there exists an x in (a,b) such that f(x) = y, ensuring that the entire interval (c,d) is covered. The discussion also suggests exploring variations of the bijection to include intervals like (c,d] and using countable subsets for further proof. Understanding these concepts solidifies the equivalence of open intervals in real numbers.
MathColie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Good Morning,
I am trying to prove that any 2 open intervals (a,b) and (c,d) are equivalent.
Show that f(x) = ((d-c)/(b-a))*(x-a)+c is one-to-one and onto (c,d).

a,b,c,d belong to the set of Real numbers with a<b and c<d.
Let f: (a,b)->(c,d) be a linear function which i graphed to help me visualize, restricting the domain to (a,b). I know I have to prove that f is a bijection but I am not sure how to do this.
I know that I am supposed to show that any two open intervals are equivalent, even if the intervals are different lengths, so the open interval (3,4) is equivalent to the open interval (1,8), (3,4) is a subset of (1,9).

I would appreciate any help with this if you can get me on the right track...thanks so much!:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MathColie said:
Good Morning,
I am trying to prove that any 2 open intervals (a,b) and (c,d) are equivalent.
Show that f(x) = ((d-c)/(b-a))*(x-a)+c is one-to-one and onto (c,d).

a,b,c,d belong to the set of Real numbers with a<b and c<d.
Let f: (a,b)->(c,d) be a linear function which i graphed to help me visualize, restricting the domain to (a,b). I know I have to prove that f is a bijection but I am not sure how to do this.
I know that I am supposed to show that any two open intervals are equivalent, even if the intervals are different lengths, so the open interval (3,4) is equivalent to the open interval (1,8), (3,4) is a subset of (1,9).

I would appreciate any help with this if you can get me on the right track...thanks so much!:confused:

You prove that it is a bijection by proving just what you said: that it is one-to-one and onto.

one-to-one: if f(x)= f(y) then x= y: if ((d-c)/(b-a))*(x-a)+c= ((d-c)/(b-a))*(y-a)+c just do the algebra1

onto: if y is in (c,d), you must show that there exist an x in (a, b) so that f(x)= y. That is, if y= ((d-c)/(b-a))*(x-a)+c, with c< y< d, solve for x and show that a< x< b.
 
Once you've done that, then for fun you can modify that bijection to prove that (a,b) and (c,d] (or variations of that) are equivalent. Just take an infinite countable subset of each (e.g. a rational subset) so that d maps into the subset of (a,b) and then all the elements of the subset get "shifted over" by index, and all the other elements mapped using your bijection.
 
Last edited:
OK Thanks so much. That was very helpful, I understand this now :smile:
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
979
Replies
3
Views
1K