Transforming a Second-Order PDE into Canonical Form: Tips and Techniques

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on transforming a second-order partial differential equation (PDE) with constant coefficients into its canonical form. The specific equation analyzed is u_xx + 13u_yy + 14u_zz - 6u_xy + 6u_yz + 2u_xz - u_x + 2u_y = 0, which has been identified as hyperbolic. The approach discussed involves diagonalizing the bilinear form of the second-order derivatives and substituting new variables to simplify the equation. The method of converting a general conic section equation to its canonical form is also referenced as a parallel technique.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Knowledge of bilinear forms and diagonalization techniques
  • Familiarity with hyperbolic equations and their properties
  • Experience with variable substitution in mathematical equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of diagonalizing bilinear forms in PDEs
  • Learn about the characteristics of hyperbolic equations in detail
  • Explore methods for transforming conic sections into canonical form
  • Research advanced techniques in variable substitution for PDEs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with partial differential equations, particularly those involved in theoretical and applied mathematics focused on canonical forms and hyperbolic equations.

r4nd0m
Messages
96
Reaction score
1
How do I transform a second-order PDE with constant coefficients into the canonical form?

I tried to solve this problem:
u_xx + 13u_yy + 14u_zz - 6u_xy + 6u_yz + 2u_xz -u_x +2u_y = 0

I wrote the bilinear form of the second order derivatives and diagonalized it. I found out that it is a hyperbolic equation. Now the problem is how to write it into the canonical form.

What I tried is I wrote it as:
u_aa + u_bb + u_cc + ...(first order derivatives) = 0
where a,b,c are the new variables (in which the matrix is diagonal) and computed the first order derivatives.
Is this a good approach or something else should be done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to convert a general conic section equation to its "cononical form"? It's really the same method. Replace the partial derivatives with x, x2, y, y2, etc. and convert that equation. Then change back to the partial derivatives.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K