Trouble with The Snowplow Problem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Xyius
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical problem known as "The Snowplow Problem," which involves determining the time when it started snowing based on the performance of a snowplow clearing a road. Participants explore the application of differential equations to model the situation, addressing assumptions about the rate of snowfall and the relationship between the snowplow's speed and snow depth.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a differential equation based on the assumption that the snowplow's speed is inversely proportional to the height of the snow.
  • Another participant points out that the original equation has four parameters but only three conditions, questioning how specific values were derived.
  • A later reply suggests that the expression can be simplified, indicating that not all parameters are independent.
  • Participants discuss the importance of correctly expanding polynomial expressions in their calculations, highlighting a mistake in one participant's work.
  • One participant shares a revised calculation resulting in a new time estimate for when it started snowing, while another suggests a method to eliminate unnecessary parameters from the equations early on.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach to solving the problem but express differing opinions on the correctness of specific calculations and assumptions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact time it started snowing, with multiple calculations leading to different results.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dependence on assumptions about the rate of snowfall and the relationship between the snowplow's speed and snow depth. There are unresolved mathematical steps and potential errors in calculations that affect the conclusions drawn.

Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4
Trouble with "The Snowplow Problem"

"One morning it began to snow very hard and continued snowing stadily throughout the day. A snowplow set out at 8:00AM to clear a road, clearing 2 miles by 11:00AM and an additional mile by 1:00 PM. At what time did it start snowing?"

This my my approach.

In the problem it states that we can assume the rate of snowfall is constant and that the speed at which the plow goes is inversely proportional to the height of the snow.

Using this information, the differential equation I come up with is..

\frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{k}{S}

Where k = proportionality constant, and S = the depth of the snow.

Since we can assume the rate of snowfall is constant, it yields another differential equation...

\frac{dS}{dt} = C

Solving for S..

\frac{dS}{dt} = C \rightarrow dS = Cdt \rightarrow S = Ct+D<br />

Substituting this into the first equation and solving..

\frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{k}{Ct+D} \rightarrow x = \frac{k}{C}ln|Ct+D|+E

My next guess would use (t=8 , x=0) (t=11 , x=2) and (t=13 , x=3) as initial values to solve for C, D and E. I get VERY messy results however. With the help of my calculator I get an numerical answer for t to be equal to -1.7085 or 11:18PM of the previous day. This doesn't make sense considering it states it starts to snow in the MORNING. if the time were positive it would translate to 1:42AM. Any help would be appreciated.

~Matt

EDIT: The chapter this is in is about solving first order differential equations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Your equation has four parameters, k, C, D, and E, but you have only three conditions. How did you get specific values for all four?
 


Yeah that's a good point, I basically know that my answer is wrong. Haha.
I am looking for some extra insight as to what I should try next. Would this be the correct way to go about this problem?
 


You don't really have 4 indepedent parameters.
Take your expression
(k/C) ln (Ct +D) + E
=(k/C) ln (C (t + D/C)) + E
= (k ln C/ C) ln (t + D/C) + E
which is the same as
= A ln(t + B) + E
Note, you want to find when Ct + D = 0, so you only need the value of D/C

This makes sense in real life. If it had snowed twice as fast, and the snowplow was twice as powerful, then the distance cleared in a given time would have been the same.

Now you have 3 equations in 3 variables
0 = A ln (8+B) + E
2 = A ln (11+B) + E
3 = A ln(12+B) + E
Subtract pairs of equations to elminate E
Then divide the two equations you get to eliminate A
You will get an equation connecting ln (12+B), ln (11+B), and ln(8+B).
Using the properties of logs, you can turn that equation into

ln[something] = 0
or
[something] = 1

And you will then have a equation you can solve for B (without using a calculator!)
 


Thanks for the help! This is what I got, tell me if it looks right.
(I did it in MathType, it would have taken WAY too long using the Latex code.

http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/6755/snowplowproblem.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:


That's the right idea, except you made one mistake.

"Pascal's triangle" was a good thing to say, but
(11+B)^3 is not 11^3 + 11^2 B + 11B^2 + B^3

Hint: (11+B)^2 is not 11^2 + 11B + B^2.
You expanded (13+B)^2 correctly, so you should be able to see what is wrong. If you can't see it, just multiply out (11+B)^3 the long way.
 


Oh! I forgot to multiply the two middle terms by 3! I re-did the calculations and got 12:15AM as the result.

Thanks a lot :D
 


I re-did the calculations and got 12:15AM as the result

When the answer to a question in a textbook comes out to a nice number, that usually means you got it right. :smile:

A neater way to sort out the constants is like this:

You have the differential equation dx/dt = k/S

You know the rate of snowfall is constant starting at time T, and you want to find T, so make T one of your parameters right from the beginning.

The depth of snow S is a straight line graph through the point (T,0), which is
S = c(t - T)
for some value of c

Now you have
dx/dt = (k/c) / (t-T)
and you can see that k and c are not really independent parameters.
So let k/c = a and the DE becomes

dx/dt = a/(t-T)
for some value of a.

From then on, everything is same as your solution, but you got rid of the unwanted parameters right from the start.
 


Makes sense! Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K