Trying to understand black holes

In summary: Space is curved because massive objects distort the straight lines that make up space. In the case of two masses, if one is much bigger than the other, the smaller mass will be pulled towards the bigger mass more than the smaller mass would be pushed away by the bigger mass. This is because the bigger mass has a much greater gravitational pull.
  • #1
acesuv
63
0
i understand that a black hole occurs because the atoms are not strong enough to hold back gravity after a certain point. is the matter continually collapsing on itself or does it stop after the atoms have been crushed? like is it a runaway effect?

my next question is why does a large mass in a small area create more gravity? thinking about the rubber sheet analogy... if you have 2 balls of the same mass but different densities (therefore different volumes)... will the denser ball really create a larger indent in the rubber sheet? i don't understand why the required gravity only occurs when an amount of mass is compressed in a small enough space.

my last question... there are two different things that I've found to define black holes. 1. light doesn't escape and 2. matter has collapsed on itself. my question is... do these occur at precicely the same moment or do they occur at different moments? are we able to have a gravity so powerful that light doesn't escape, yet matter isn't collapsed? are we able to have collapsed matter with light escaping from it?

thank u so much
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
acesuv said:
my next question is why does a large mass in a small area create more gravity?
Large mass gives higher gravity, it doesn't necessarily have to be in a small area.
 
  • #3
acesuv said:
if you have 2 balls of the same mass but different densities (therefore different volumes)... will the denser ball really create a larger indent in the rubber sheet?
The denser ball will create a steeper slope, which represents stronger local gravity, if the sheet represents the gravitational potential well:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_well
 
  • Like
Likes acesuv
  • #4
To answer the first question, we don't exactly have a completed answer. When the matter collapses and electron degeneracy, neutron degeneracy and possibly even quark degeneracy still is insufficient strength to prevent the collapse, it just continues collapsing into a singularity. Now this is the process that we do not understand because it now has no physical parameters, but infinite density and infinite gravity (only at the singularity). This collapse may never stop, we just do not know.

To answer your second question, I will create a scenario. Let' say that I have two stars, each of one solar mass(1.9891 x 10^30 kg), and condense one of the two until it is about a quarter of its original size. This condensed star would have more intense gravity when at a close distance, but from a significant distance, such as the orbits of our planets, it would be completely unchanged. This would be the same for a one solar mass black hole if it sat at the centre of our solar system (replaced the Sun), none of the planetary orbits would change, but If anything came into a close enough proximity of it, they would experience intense gravity.

To answer your last question, during the collapse, the radius obviously decreases. Now once this radius becomes smaller than the Schwarzschild Radius (which can be calculated by "Rs = 2GM/c^2"), the collapsing star would appear to become 'black'. So, the matter is collapsing while this 'light barrier' (to put it simply) is reached. But even after this 'barrier' is reached, the collapse would still continue, but would just be invisible to us.

I hope this answers yours questions and helps you to understand this concept better :)
 
  • Like
Likes acesuv
  • #5
acesuv said:
my next question is why does a large mass in a small area create more gravity? thinking about the rubber sheet analogy... if you have 2 balls of the same mass but different densities (therefore different volumes)... will the denser ball really create a larger indent in the rubber sheet? i don't understand why the required gravity only occurs when an amount of mass is compressed in a small enough space.

Not only does gravity increase with the reduction of r in the Newtonian equation [itex](g=Gm/r^2)[/itex] but in relativity, you also have the metric tensor (which '..captures all the geometric and causal structure of spacetime') which is represented in the second half of the equation below-

[tex]g=\frac{Gm}{r^2}\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{2Gm}{rc^2}}}[/tex]

where [itex]G[/itex] is the gravitational constant, [itex]m[/itex] is the mass of the object and [itex]c[/itex] is the speed of light. The more compact an object becomes, the more gravity begins to increase exponentially.
 
  • Like
Likes acesuv
  • #6
acesuv said:
my next question is why does a large mass in a small area create more gravity? thinking about the rubber sheet analogy... if you have 2 balls of the same mass but different densities (therefore different volumes)... will the denser ball really create a larger indent in the rubber sheet? i don't understand why the required gravity only occurs when an amount of mass is compressed in a small enough space.
In case the other answers were insufficient I will attempt to answer this in my layperson's way, and I'm going to use super rounded numbers just for clarity.

Gravitational force (or curvature) is dependent only on the mass and the distance.

Imagine a star 10x solar mass. Imagine it has a radius of, say, 5 million miles.
If you hovered in a spaceship at a distance from the star's centre of 5.1 million miles, you would feel a pull of X.

Now take that star of 10x solar mass and crush it to the radius of the Earth: 4,000 miles.
If you hovered in a spaceship at a distance from this star's centre of 5.1 million miles, you would feel the exact same pull of X. (mass has not changed, distance to centre of mass has not changed. Note that, if you had no windows on your spacecraft , you could not tell, based on your orbit, the size of the body you were orbiting, or your altitude above its surface - you could only tell its mass and the distance to the mass's centre. At a distance, the pull from a 10 solar mass block of styrofoam is identical to the pull from a 10 solar mass black hole.)

But - you are now (5.1 million - 4,000 =) 5,996,000 miles above the surface of the star. You could drop to a lower altitude - a lot lower altitude - if you wanted to. You are able to get much MUCH closer to the centre of mass of the star.

To sum: gravity is not stronger around a black hole, it is solely due to the compactness of a black hole that you can get closer.
 
  • Like
Likes acesuv, TEFLing, diogenesNY and 1 other person
  • #7
acesuv said:
my last question... there are two different things that I've found to define black holes. 1. light doesn't escape and 2. matter has collapsed on itself. my question is... do these occur at precicely the same moment or do they occur at different moments? are we able to have a gravity so powerful that light doesn't escape, yet matter isn't collapsed? are we able to have collapsed matter with light escaping from it?

Some neutron stars, if they are compact enough, are predicted to have a photon sphere which would reside at 3M (where M=Gm/c2) though this strictly speaking isn't capturing the light as it can still escape to infinity. Light follows the curvature of spacetime and for the light not to escape, the mass has to be within the boundary of 2M (which is often called the Schwarzschild radius and defines the event horizon for a static black hole), once mass falls within this boundary there is no stable radius and the mass is predicted to collapse to a singularity (though this may change once a theory of quantum gravity has been established).

acesuv said:
i understand that a black hole occurs because the atoms are not strong enough to hold back gravity after a certain point. is the matter continually collapsing on itself or does it stop after the atoms have been crushed? like is it a runaway effect?

According to the time component of the Schwarzschild interior metric (see below), the point of no return is when the radius of the object reaches 9/4M (or 2.25M), this is when the proper time ([itex]\tau[/itex]) at the centre of the neutron star becomes zero, this is a product that defines the event horizon of a black hole. As the matter collapses past 9/4M, the event horizon moves outwards from the centre towards surface until the star surface and the EH meet at 2M (see this image, the pink line represents the event horizon, the blue lines the collapsing star). Anything within 2M will collapse towards the singularity.

[tex]d\tau=\left( \frac{3}{2}\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r_0}}-\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{1-\frac{2Mr^{2}}{r_0^{3}}}\right)dt[/tex]
where [itex]r_0[/itex] is the radius of the star, [itex]M=Gm/c^2[/itex] and [itex]r[/itex] is the radius where you want to calculate the time dilation

You might also find the following link of interest, particularly the The Schwarzschild Metric and Inside the Black Hole sections-

Spacetime Geometry Inside a Black Hole
 
  • Like
Likes acesuv
  • #8
DaveC426913 said:
...

To sum: gravity is not stronger around a black hole, it is solely due to the compactness of a black hole that you can get closer.

That seems like an important clarification

As for the interior metric, seems like the cores of collapsed objects are forevermore fossilized for want of worthier words
 

What is a black hole?

A black hole is a region in space where the gravitational pull is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape from it.

How are black holes formed?

Black holes are formed when a massive star dies and collapses under its own gravity. This collapse causes the star's core to become extremely dense and eventually form a singularity, which is the center of a black hole.

How do we study black holes?

We study black holes through observations of their effects on surrounding matter and light. We also use mathematical models and simulations to understand their properties and behavior.

What happens if you fall into a black hole?

If you were to fall into a black hole, you would experience intense tidal forces that would stretch your body. As you approach the singularity, these forces would become infinite. However, current theories suggest that you would not actually reach the singularity, but instead get trapped in the event horizon, the point of no return.

Can black holes be destroyed?

According to current theories, black holes cannot be destroyed. However, they can lose mass through Hawking radiation, which is a process where pairs of particles are created near the event horizon and one falls in while the other escapes. This causes the black hole to gradually lose mass and eventually evaporate over a very long time.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
972
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top