MHB *Two locomotives approach each other

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approach
AI Thread Summary
Two locomotives traveling towards each other at 155 km/h are initially 8.5 km apart. The closing speed of the locomotives is 310 km/h, leading to a calculated time of approximately 1 minute and 39 seconds for them to meet. This is derived from the formula t = d/r, where d is the distance and r is the relative speed. Both methods of calculation confirm that the time to collision is about 99 seconds. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding relative speed in such scenarios.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\textsf{Two locomotives approach each other on parallel tracks.}\\$
$\textsf{Each has a speed of 155 km/h with respect to the ground.}\\ $
$\textsf{If they are initially 8.5 km apart}\\$
$\textsf{a. how long will it be before they reach each other?}\\$
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
t&=\frac{d}{r}\\
&=\frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{8.5}{155}\\
&\approx0.0274 \, h \\
&\approx\color{red}{99 \, seconds}
\end{align*}

ok this looks very simple
so I'm sure I got it wrong
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
closing speed is 310 km/hr

$t = \dfrac{d}{r} = \dfrac{8.5 \,km}{310 \,km/hr} \approx 1 \, min \, 39 \, sec$
 
Either argue, as skeeter does, that relative to one of the locomotives, the other has speed 155+ 155= 310 kph and has to go distance 8.5 km so will take time $\frac{8.5}{310}= 0.0274$ hours so 0.0274(60)= 1.6451 min= 1 min 39 seconds.

Or argue, as you apparently do, that, since the two trains have the same speed, 155 kph, and must cover half the distance, 8.5/2= 4.25 km, the time will be $\frac{4.25}{155}= 0.0274$ hours so 0.0274(60)= 1.6451 min= 1 min 39 seconds.

1 min 39 seconds is, of course, 60+ 39= 99 seconds as you say.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top