Two particles in superposition

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter freerangequark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles Superposition
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the interaction of two particles in superposition within an isolated system, exploring whether they would collapse each other's wave functions and the implications of their interactions. The scope includes theoretical considerations of quantum mechanics, entanglement, and the effects of external influences on wave function collapse.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that whether two particles interact depends on their type and the presence of a coupling mechanism, such as electromagnetic interactions.
  • One participant questions the use of the term "collapse," proposing that interactions create a hybrid system with new energy levels and wave functions rather than collapsing them.
  • Another participant raises the scenario of non-entangled photons in superposition, questioning how their interaction would affect their wave functions.
  • It is noted that two electrons in a helium atom could remain in a product state without interaction, but interactions would lead to a mixed state where measurements of one electron would depend on the other.
  • One participant discusses the potential for external influences to collapse the wave function of a system, while internal interactions do not lead to collapse, raising questions about the implications for the wave function of the universe.
  • Another participant posits that if two non-entangled particles interact, they may become entangled, leading to a superposition of states for the pair.
  • Concerns are raised about the influence of gravity on isolated systems and whether it could collapse their wave functions, referencing Roger Penrose's ideas on the subject.
  • There is a suggestion that the strength of the interaction would determine whether external influences could affect the isolated system, with some skepticism about the validity of Penrose's claims.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the nature of interactions between particles in superposition, the concept of wave function collapse, and the influence of external factors like gravity. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding due to the complexity of quantum mechanics, the potential for varying interpretations of interactions, and the unresolved nature of the implications of gravity on quantum systems.

freerangequark
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
If you had an isolated system consisting of two particles both of which were in superposition, would they interact with each other and collapse each other's wave function?

Thanks,
FRQ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whether or not they would interact depends on what kind of partcle it is. There needs to be some sort of "coupling mechanism" , e.g. some electromagnetic dipole-dipole interaction. If there is a "classical" interaction there will also be a "QM" interaction.

The word "collapse" is somewhat missleading. Wha happens if you have e.g. two coupled spin 1/2 systems is essentially that a "hybrid" system is created with new energy levels, wavefunctions etc. However, it is still very much a QM system.
 
Not being anything more than a reader of popular physics books, I'm trying to understand what you're saying.

Are you talking about an entangled pair?

In my example, I was wondering what would happen if the isolated system contained two of the same type of particle... let's say a pair of non-entangled photons in superposition. (when I say non-entangled, I mean not entangled with each other.)

Thanks,
FRQ
 
freerangequark said:
In my example, I was wondering what would happen if the isolated system contained two of the same type of particle... let's say a pair of non-entangled photons in superposition. (when I say non-entangled, I mean not entangled with each other.)

One could also consider the two electrons in a helium atom (assuming that the core is approximately fixed due to its large mass). Without interaction the electrons would remain in a product state (in an antisymmetrized form, to be precise) for all time if they were initially. A product state is a state where the measurement of position of electron 1 yields independent results of the measurement of position of electron 2:

[tex]\psi(x_1,x_2) = \psi_1(x_1)\cdot\psi_2(x_2)[/tex]

(for simplicity I've neglected fermionic antisymmetrization)

But if the electrons do interact, an initial product state will get mixed with other product states during the time evolution. Therefore the measurement of electron 2 will almost always depend on measurement of electron 1:

[tex]\psi(x_1,x_2) \not= \psi_1(x_1)\cdot\psi_2(x_2)[/tex]

Of course even a system without interaction need not always be in a product state. For example, it may have started as a product state in the past (e.g. after you have simultaneously measured the position of both electrons), then you "turned" the interaction on, which has mixed product states, then you turn the interaction off. The system will then remain in its current mixed state, although there is no interaction any more. Thus the superposition of pure product states can be considered as a kind of memory of past interactions.
 
Last edited:
freerangequark said:
In my example, I was wondering what would happen if the isolated system contained two of the same type of particle... let's say a pair of non-entangled photons in superposition. (when I say non-entangled, I mean not entangled with each other.)

The problem is that something "external" to the system might be able to collapse the wavefunction of said system, but something "internal" can not. So for example, if you had one photon, another photon can come along and potentially "collapse" the wavefunction. HOWEVER: the system of two photons has a wavefunction that has not collapsed. Another photon can come along and collapse the wavefunction of the 2-photon system, but the wavefunction of the 3-photon system remains uncollapsed. This chain can go on forever!

This is a problem that lives in the heart of the physics subfield known as "Quantum Cosmology", where people have tried to construct the "wavefunction of the universe" (Wheeler-DeWitt Equation). What is not clear is that even if such a thing exists (and I'm not saying that it does or doesn't) - can it ever be "collapsed"?

Another problem that has been popularized by Roger Penrose is: how can you ever isolate a system, since gravity couples to everything? Therefore, isn't the (**incredibly** tiny!) gravitational pull from the Andromeda galaxy "collapsing the wavefunction" of every isolated system we construct?

As you can see, FRQ, this is a very deep problem!
 
What happens if two particles (such that the state of each one individually could be expressed as a superposition of basis states, but which aren't initially entangled) interact? Don't they just become entangled (such that the state of the pair is not yet "collapsed" but could be expressed as a superposition...)?

blechman said:
Another problem that has been popularized by Roger Penrose is: how can you ever isolate a system, since gravity couples to everything? Therefore, isn't the (**incredibly** tiny!) gravitational pull from the Andromeda galaxy "collapsing the wavefunction" of every isolated system we construct?

Wouldn't that only be true if the interaction were strong enough that you could determine something about the "isolated system" by measuring changes over in Andromeda? (Lately, Penrose has been known to publicise some questionable ideas.)
 
cesiumfrog said:
Wouldn't that only be true if the interaction were strong enough that you could determine something about the "isolated system" by measuring changes over in Andromeda? (Lately, Penrose has been known to publicise some questionable ideas.)

Perhaps. I'm not saying I necessarily agree with it. I only throw it out there as a possible added confusion. Penrose has said some outlandish things in his time, but he's a very smart guy! I think it's still an open debate as to how serious to take such issues. I am not a QC expert, and every time I try to get into it, I come out with a splitting headache! :rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K