What Excited State Was the Two-Times Ionized Lithium Initially In?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skrat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lithium
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the initial excited state of two-times ionized Lithium based on the emitted photon wavelengths of 72.91 nm and 13.5 nm. The user initially attempts to calculate the energy levels using the Rydberg formula but encounters confusion regarding the transitions and the correct application of the Rydberg constant. It is clarified that each photon corresponds to a transition between energy levels, and the user is advised to sum the energies of the emitted photons to find the initial state. Ultimately, the correct approach involves using the scaled Rydberg constant for Lithium, leading to the conclusion that the initial excited state corresponds to n=3. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying the Rydberg formula for hydrogen-like atoms.
skrat
Messages
740
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Two times ionized Lithium (Z=3) in excited states emits two photons, one with ##\lambda _1=72.91 nm## and another one with ##\lambda _2=13.5 nm##.
In which excited state was originally the ion?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Since two times ionized Lithium has only one electron I assume I can say that the energies of eigenstates are calculated as ##E_n=\frac{R_y}{n^2}##.

I somehow imagined that I have to sum the energy of photons and equal that with the expression above.

##\frac{hc}{\lambda _1}+\frac{hc}{\lambda _2}+R_y=R_y(1-\frac{1}{n^2})##

But this gives me some weird result...

What do I have to do? :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
skrat said:
Since two times ionized Lithium has only one electron I assume I can say that the energies of eigenstates are calculated as ##E_n=\frac{R_y}{n^2}##.

I somehow imagined that I have to sum the energy of photons and equal that with the expression above.
That's not correct. The energy of one photon already corresponds to a transition between two levels: the difference between the initial excited state and the final state.

Start again from the equation for the energy, but consider one transition at a time. After that you will have to combine both transitions to get the desired solution.
 
Than first transition is:

##\frac{hc}{\lambda _1}=R_y(\frac{1}{(n')^2}-\frac{1}{(n)^2})##

and second

##\frac{hc}{\lambda _2}=R_y(1-\frac{1}{(n')^2})##

I hope that's exactly what you had in mind.

However, to get rid of ##(n')^2## I woud simply sum the both equation.

##\frac{hc}{\lambda _2}+\frac{hc}{\lambda _1}=R_y(1-\frac{1}{n^2})##
 
skrat said:
##\frac{hc}{\lambda _2}+\frac{hc}{\lambda _1}=R_y(1-\frac{1}{n^2})##
That looks ok. What do you get when you try to solve this for ##n##?

(Note: the problem is not clearly stated, and I misread it the first time. This explains why I might have made you rederive the equation you had at the beginning, although now without the extra ##R_y##.)
 
The next part confuses me the most...

##n^2=\left [1-\frac{hc}{R_y}(\frac{1}{\lambda _2}+\frac{1}{\lambda _1}) \right ]^{-1}##

which gives me ##n=0.378##
 
skrat said:
The next part confuses me the most...

##n^2=\left [1-\frac{hc}{R_y}(\frac{1}{\lambda _2}+\frac{1}{\lambda _1}) \right ]^{-1}##

which gives me ##n=0.378##

You're using the wrong Rydberg constant. It has to be scaled for the charge of the nucleus.
 
DrClaude said:
You're using the wrong Rydberg constant. It has to be scaled for the charge of the nucleus.

##R_y=13.6 eV##

How do I do that?

Lithum has 3 nucleus is than the right Rydberg constant multiplied by 3?
 
skrat said:
##R_y=13.6 eV##

How do I do that?

Lithum has 3 nucleus is than the right Rydberg constant multiplied by 3?

Do you have the equation for the energy levels of hydrogenic atoms? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen-like_atom
 
Ok, that's good to now.

So using ##Z^2R_y## gives me ##n=3##.

Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K