chaoseverlasting
- 1,051
- 3
Our teacher was very curt with us in class, and I am not sure if the Benzylic carbocation is more stable than the allylic one or not. Can anyone help me?
chaos said:The + charge on the benzylic one is delocalised over the benzene ring where as the + charge on the allylic c+ is only delocalised over 3 carbon atoms.
Nice. If I may, allyl be asking you a quickie. Where would you put your money, if you had a tertiary benzylic carbocation?chemisttree said:Destroy the symmetry by substituting something on the ring and all bets are off...
chaoseverlasting said:I drew 4 canonical structures for the ph-CH2+ carbocation and only 2 for CH2=CH-CH2+, and the meta position does not get the positive charge, I overlooked that. Only the 2 ortho positions and the para position get the positive charge on them, so the +ive charge is delocalised over 4 carbon atoms (2 ortho, 1 para and the CH2+).
On the CH2=CH-CH2+, there were only two structures but they were both equivalent... It only exists in one form and undergoes resonance... Does that make it more stable?
Alternatively, you can use the argument you used before about delocalization of the positive charge. The greater the number of positions over which you can spread the positive charge, the greater the stability.Gokul43201 said:As a rule of thumb, the greater the number of resonance contributions, the greater the stability of the carbocation.