Understanding Dehydration of Alcohols: Common Questions About the Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Alcohols
AI Thread Summary
In the dehydration experiment of alcohols, the distilled alkene is washed with a base solution primarily to neutralize any remaining acid catalyst. This step ensures that traces of acid do not affect subsequent reactions or analyses. The use of an acid catalyst is essential for converting alcohols to alkenes, making the neutralization process crucial. Overall, washing the alkene with a base is a standard practice to enhance purity. This procedure is vital for accurate experimental results.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
I have a question about the general dehydration experiment.

Why is the alkene that was distilled from the dehydration reaction washed with a base solution?

Is this to neutralize the remaining traces of acid?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think since the only way to convert an alcohol to an alkene would be using an acid catalyst, then washing the resultant alkene with a base would neutralize this acid, so yes,you are correct
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top