Understanding Eigenvalue Measurement in Quantum Systems

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter M. next
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurement Operator
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurement of eigenvalues in quantum systems, particularly focusing on the implications of measuring operators A and B sequentially. Participants explore the relationship between quantum states and the effects of measurement on these states, including the transition from one state to another after measurement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that measuring an operator A results in the state collapsing to the corresponding eigenstate if the measurement yields a specific eigenvalue.
  • Others argue that the process of measurement involves projecting the state onto the eigenvector associated with the measured eigenvalue, rather than directly transitioning to that eigenstate.
  • A participant describes a scenario involving two sequential measurements of operators B and A, questioning how the state changes after measuring B and the implications for the subsequent measurement of A.
  • Another participant clarifies that the operators A and B do not share common eigenstates, which complicates the measurement process and state projection.
  • There is a discussion about the mathematical representation of operators in terms of their eigenstates and how to calculate probabilities associated with measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of state collapse and the measurement process, indicating that there is no consensus on how the measurement of operators affects the quantum state. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific measurement scenarios and mathematical formulations, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the nature of the operators and the states involved. The discussion highlights the complexity of quantum measurements and the need for careful consideration of the relationships between different operators.

M. next
Messages
380
Reaction score
0
when we have a certain state ψ(t)
and it is acted on by an operator A of eigenstates a, b, c and eigen vectors la>, lb>, lc>

does it mean that after measuring A ( if the result was 'a'), the state lψ(t)> becomes in state la>?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes.
 
i will tell you what was the problem, we were given a state lpsi> the question was: let us carry out a set of two measurements where B is measured first and then, immediately A is measured. Find the probability of obtaining a value of 0 for B and a value of 1 for A.

the first part was easy, i found the eigen pvalues of operator B and eigenstates.
and then the probability as they asked.
when i moved to the second part, they said exactly, in the solution:
we deal now with the measurement of the other observablr A. the observables A and B do not have common eigenstates. After measuring B ( the result is b=0) the system is left in a state lphi> which can be found by projecting lpsi> onto the eigenvector of b=0!
How come? isnot it supposed to be as u claimed in your answer that it be directly in the eigenstate of b=0?
 
you have talked about only one operator in op,The second one is different.
 
then? can you elaborate more? and what is it that is different?
 
M. next said:
when we have a certain state ψ(t)
and it is acted on by an operator A of eigenstates a, b, c and eigen vectors la>, lb>, lc>

does it mean that after measuring A ( if the result was 'a'), the state lψ(t)> becomes in state la>?

Not quite. An operator acting on a state like A|psi> is not the same as |psi> being measured with A. The first is just what it should be, an application of the linear operator on the state, without any projections or probabilities going on. The latter is the application of the measurement postulate that says measuring |psi> with A gives back an eigenvector |a> of A with the probability |<a|psi>|^2.
 
yes, but it is not the case. please read my second post,
 
M. next said:
i will tell you what was the problem, we were given a state lpsi> the question was: let us carry out a set of two measurements where B is measured first and then, immediately A is measured. Find the probability of obtaining a value of 0 for B and a value of 1 for A.

the first part was easy, i found the eigen pvalues of operator B and eigenstates.
and then the probability as they asked.
when i moved to the second part, they said exactly, in the solution:
we deal now with the measurement of the other observablr A. the observables A and B do not have common eigenstates. After measuring B ( the result is b=0) the system is left in a state lphi> which can be found by projecting lpsi> onto the eigenvector of b=0!
How come? isnot it supposed to be as u claimed in your answer that it be directly in the eigenstate of b=0?
No.I said that if eigen value find is a,and the ket corresponding to it is|A> THEN by projecting |∅> into that state i.e calculating.<A|∅>,One can write |∅> for that state.
 
Take a look at this: you start with a state [itex]|\Psi\rangle[/itex]. we can write out the operator [itex]\hat{B}[/itex] in terms of it's eigenstates
[tex] \hat{B} = b'_{0} |b_0 \rangle\langle b_0| + b'_{1} |b_1\rangle \langle b_1| + ...[/tex]
if we want to pull out an eigenvalue you can just hit this guy with any of the eigenstates we are interested in. Now, Dirac's number one rule: after measuring a system, it is left in an eigenstate of whatever was measured. So we measured the eigenvalue for, say, [itex]b'_0[/itex], so our system is in the state corresponding to that eigenvalue. So take the equation for [itex]\hat{B}[/itex] up above and hit it with [itex]|\Psi\rangle[/itex] on the right. Then [itex]|\langle b_0 |\Psi\rangle|^2[/itex] is the probability to get eigenvalue [itex]b'_0[/itex].

Now the system is in state [itex]|b_0\rangle[/itex], now write the operator [itex]\hat{A}[/itex] like before
[tex] \hat{A}=a'_0 |a_0\rangle \langle a_0 |+ ...[/tex]
so to compute [itex]\hat{A}|b_0\rangle[/itex] we just hit the above with the state [itex]|b_0\rangle[/itex] on the right. Then the probability for any of the n eigenvalues is [itex]| \langle a_n | b_0 \rangle |^2[/itex]. I hope this helps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K