Understanding Mean Field Theory for Hamiltonians for Beginners

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Mean
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of Mean Field Theory (MFT) in the context of Hamiltonians, particularly concerning the separation of creation and annihilation operators, denoted as a and b operators. The key conclusion is that while a and b operators describe different particles and can be assumed to commute, their interaction introduces coupling between their respective Hilbert spaces. The commutation relation for creation and annihilation operators, specifically [ a_i, a_j^\dagger ] = \delta_{ij}, is essential for understanding their behavior within MFT. The analogy with orbital angular momentum and spin further illustrates the coupling dynamics in quantum systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Mean Field Theory (MFT)
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Knowledge of creation and annihilation operators
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics, particularly Hilbert spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the role of Fock spaces in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the effects of spin-orbit coupling in quantum systems
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of Mean Field Theory in many-body physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in many-body systems and the application of Mean Field Theory to Hamiltonians.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
My book has a chapter on the general mean field approach. I have attached a page of it I don't understand very well. I do understand the general idea of meanfield theory:
Expand operators around their average and assume small fluctuations and neglect the second order term.
But in the attached page they use a form of the Hamiltonian I am only just getting used to. And for mean field theory to work I need to be able to separate the product of the a-operators and b-operators (in the given hamiltonian they appear as abba with daggers on some of them of course). Can I assume that a and b operators commute? They describe different particles but on the other hand it is interaction between a and b particles that is relevant. So what do I do?
 

Attachments

  • Meanfield.png
    Meanfield.png
    58.2 KB · Views: 469
Physics news on Phys.org
If the operators represent different particles, then yes, they will commute. For creation and annihilation operators, this is apparent through the commutation relation
[tex]\left[ a_i, a_j^\dagger \right] = \delta_{ij}[/tex]
The reason this works is that each particle has its own "Hilbert space" (a Fock space in this case), and the operators a act in one of them, and the operators b in the other. The interaction term means that the spaces aren't independent (they're coupled in some way), but does not change what the operators actually do.

There is an analogous example for just one particle. We know that its orbital angular momentum [itex]\hat{L}[/itex] and spin [itex]\hat{S}[/itex] commute, since these live in separate spaces (see this thread for more on this) and represent distinct physical concepts. Yet, we know that atoms will have spin-orbit coupling. This interaction is of the form [itex]\hat{L} \cdot \hat{S}[/itex], and couples the spin and the orbital angular momenta. If you write down the total angular momentum [itex]\hat{J}=\hat{L}+\hat{S}[/itex] in matrix form, the interaction is represented by the off-diagonal elements. It'll look the same way for the [itex]a[/itex]:s and [itex]a^\dagger[/itex]:s.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K