Understanding Notation and Proving Linear Independence

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that if the set {x_1, x_2, ..., x_m} is linearly independent, then the set {x_1, x_2, ..., x_i-1, x_i+1, ..., x_m} remains linearly independent for every index i in {1, 2, ..., m}. The key insight is that removing one vector from a linearly independent set cannot create a linear dependence among the remaining vectors. A proof by contradiction is suggested, where assuming the smaller set is dependent leads to a contradiction regarding the larger set's independence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear independence in vector spaces
  • Familiarity with proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction
  • Basic knowledge of vector notation and set theory
  • Concept of linear combinations of vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of linear independence in depth, focusing on vector spaces
  • Learn about proof techniques, especially proof by contradiction
  • Explore examples of linear combinations and their implications on vector sets
  • Investigate the implications of removing vectors from sets in linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of vector independence and proof strategies.

cateater2000
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hi I just need some help on understanding some general notation in this quesiton:

Prove if {x_1,x_2,..,x_m} is linearly independent then so is {x_1,x_2,...,x_i-1, x_i+1,...,x_m} for every i in {1,2,...,m}.


I don't really understand what the difference between {x_1,x_2,...,x_i-1, x_i+1,...,x_m} for every i in {1,2,...,m} and {x_1,x_2,..,x_m} is.

Any help clarifying this would be great, and any hints for the question would be must appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second set omits the i'th vector.

Eg the large set is {a,b,c,d} and there are 4 other sets: {b,c,d}, {a,c,d}, {a,b,d}, {a,b,c}
 
If you understand that, you can easily prove this by contradiction.
Suppose one of the smaller sets is linearly dependent, then one of its elements is a lineair combination of the others. What does that tell you about the larger set then?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K