Understanding the universe in real time

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter flyinhigh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of observing distant galaxies and what the universe might look like today compared to its state 13 billion years ago. Participants explore concepts related to cosmic expansion, the age of the universe, and the implications of observing light from ancient galaxies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the implications of observing a galaxy 30 billion light years away, suggesting it reflects the universe as it was 30 billion years ago.
  • Another participant clarifies that the light from the most distant galaxy observed actually originated 13.1 billion years ago, due to the expansion of the universe.
  • A further response elaborates that while the light was emitted 13 billion years ago, it traveled through expanding space, resulting in a greater distance than 13 billion light years.
  • Another participant emphasizes the age of the universe, stating that no light can be older than 13.8 billion years and discusses the implications of cosmic expansion and the observable universe.
  • One participant reiterates their original question about what the universe looks like today, 13 billion years after the Big Bang, indicating uncertainty about the current state of the universe.
  • A later reply acknowledges the difficulty of knowing the current state of the universe, suggesting that it has evolved based on reasonable assumptions drawn from observations of nearer galaxies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of cosmic observations and the understanding of the universe's age and expansion. There is no consensus on what the universe looks like today based on the observations of ancient galaxies.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the complexities of cosmic expansion and the limitations of current observational capabilities. There are assumptions about the evolution of galaxies that remain unverified.

flyinhigh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Astronomy news on Phys.org
We are not looking back 30 billion years. We are only looking back 13.1 billion years. The difference is due to the expansion of the universe moving the galaxy away from us while the light that we see was still in transit.
 
To say what Drakkith said, another way, is this: the time difference is that while the light was emitted 13B years ago, it had to travel through a lot more that 13B light years of space, because space has been expanding, so while the light is always traveling at c locally, it is heavily red-shifted by the time it gets to us
 
An "amature" should know the difference between 30 and 13. The Big Bang happened (we believe) about 13.8 billion (thousand million) years ago. Therefore no light is older than 13.8 billion years. During the first fractions of a second of the Big Bang, (we believe) the Universe expanded at many times the speed of light so that we estimate that the Observable Universe now has a radius of about 46 billion light-years (centered on us, of course). It is 100 years since Einstein showed that terms such as "real time" are meaningless. This isn't the place for a course on relativity as it applies to cosmology, an ok place to start is wikipedia, although there are many good video introductions on the web, too. So, the Universe is about 14 billion years old. We have assumed for decades that the Universe is isotropic and homogenous. These assuptions have been tested and so far have held up, but we're still "new" at this stuff so tomorrow might find us changing our minds as we learn more about the Universe. Keep in mind, we have a fairly good grasp (we think) of only about 5% of the "stuff" (energy) that the Universe is composed of - meaning that we're 95% "in the dark" with lots to learn. But so far, we think the Universe looks pretty much the same (on "average") any direction you look. Which is to say if you want to know what the Universe looks like "now", look around you. Our Galaxy is only about 100,000 light years across, so looking out at the stars in the sky is seeing the whole Universe as it is "now". What's so cool about looking far into the past is seeing how the Universe was then when stars were new and galaxies hadn't yet formed. We think that the early Universe looked a LOT different than it does today.
 
thanks for pointing out my error. however, that was not my question. let me be clear. if we observe the universe as it was 13bn years ago... what does is look like today, 13b years after the BB?
 
flyinhigh said:
thanks for pointing out my error. however, that was not my question. let me be clear. if we observe the universe as it was 13bn years ago... what does is look like today, 13b years after the BB?

There's no way to know really, since we can't see it. We infer however, with some very reasonable assumptions, that it has evolved in the same way that it appears to have evolved based on what we CAN see right now even though what we are seeing varies from near-real-time very locally to 13B years in the past in the case of things like the Hubble Deep Field.

For example, some of the galaxies that we see in the Hubble Deep Field are not yet well formed because we are seeing them relatively shortly after the singularity but we assume that they have by now evolved just to be like the nearer galaxies that we can see in the less distant past.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 148 ·
5
Replies
148
Views
13K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K