MHB Understanding Two Graph Theory Problems

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on two graph theory problems. The first problem addresses the definition of a tree, confirming that if there is only one simple path between any two vertices in graph G, then G is indeed a tree. The second problem questions the conditions under which complete bipartite graphs are also complete graphs, specifically asking for which values of m and n in K_{m,n} the graph is equivalent to K_{m+n}. It is suggested that the completeness may depend on whether m and n can be zero. Clarifications and proofs for both problems are sought by the original poster.
Puzzles
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I'm struggling with these two problems:

1. If for whichever two vertices a and b in the graph G there is only one simple path from a to b, then the graph is a tree.

Eh... isn't this part of the definition for a tree? I really don't even know where to start with proving this statements.

2. Find which complete bipartite graphs are complete.

What does it mean which COMPLETE bipartite graphs are complete? Can a complete bipartite graph not be complete?

Any help is very much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are several equivalent definitions of a tree. Some of them are:
  1. A connected acyclic graph.
  2. A graph where every two vertices are connected by a single simple path.
  3. A connected graph where every edge is a bridge (i.e., its removal makes the graph disconnected).
  4. A connected graph with $n$ vertices and $n-1$ edges.
  5. An acyclic graph with $n$ vertices and $n-1$ edges.

Concerning the second problem, a complete graph $K_n$ on $n$ vertices is a graph that has an edge between every pair of vertices. So I think the question means, for which $m$ and $n$ the complete bipartite graph $K_{m,n}$ is also $K_{m+n}$. The answer probably depends on whether $m$ and $n$ in $K_{m,n}$ can be zero.
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K