Where Can I Find the Proof of Asymptotically Helical Trajectory in a Lattice?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of asymptotically helical trajectories in a lattice as presented by Minsky in his 1982 article 'Cellular vacuum'. Minsky claims that any bounded packet moving within a regular lattice must exhibit this trajectory but fails to provide references. The necessary citation is found on page 548 of Minsky's article, where he references P.A.M. Dirac's work from 1958, which establishes that a bounded packet must indeed have an asymptotically helical trajectory in a lattice.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of lattice theory
  • Familiarity with asymptotic analysis
  • Knowledge of theoretical physics concepts
  • Ability to interpret academic journal articles
NEXT STEPS
  • Read P.A.M. Dirac's "On the theory of lattices," Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 246 (1958), 326-332
  • Explore advanced topics in lattice dynamics
  • Investigate the implications of asymptotic behavior in quantum mechanics
  • Study the mathematical foundations of helical trajectories in physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians specializing in lattice theory, and researchers exploring the dynamics of bounded packets in quantum systems.

intervoxel
Messages
192
Reaction score
1
In the article 'Cellular vacuum' (Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21: 537-551, 1982), Minsky writes: "One can prove that any bounded packet which moves within a regular lattice must have an asymptotically helical trajectory...". But he gives no references whatsoever.
I had no success in a search on the internet, so I ask if someone could help me in this regard.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reference for this statement is actually provided in the article itself. It can be found on page 548, where Minsky cites the work of P.A.M. Dirac, who first showed that a bounded packet must have an asymptotically helical trajectory in a lattice. The relevant citation is: P. A. M. Dirac, "On the theory of lattices," Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 246 (1958), 326-332.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K