Here's a question from Apostol's Calculus Vol1(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Suppose that instead of the usual definition of norm of a vector in [tex]V_n[/tex], we define it the following way,

[tex]||A|| = \sum_{k=1}^{n}|a_k|.[/tex]

Using this definition in [tex]V_2[/tex] describe on a figure the set of all points [tex](x,y)[/tex] of norm 1.

Is it possible to do that? Doesn't every point [tex](x,y)[/tex] of the form [tex](\frac{1}{s}, \frac{s-1}{s}), s \geq 1[/tex] satisfy the condition? (i.e., the number of points is not finite)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Using a different definition of norm

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**