Using a different definition of norm

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter neutrino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Norm
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around an alternative definition of the norm of a vector in V_n, specifically examining the implications of defining the norm as the sum of the absolute values of its components. Participants explore how this definition affects the description of points in V_2 that have a norm of 1, as well as comparisons with other norms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether it is possible to describe all points (x,y) of norm 1 under the new definition, suggesting that an infinite number of points satisfy the condition.
  • Another participant counters that the number of points does not affect the ability to describe them, referencing the unit circle as an example of a set with an uncountable number of points.
  • A participant proposes examining the four cases of the signs of x and y to simplify the problem, particularly noting the case where both x and y are positive.
  • One participant introduces the concept of other norms, stating that the max norm is equivalent to the usual norm and describes the geometric shapes formed by points of norm 1 under different definitions.
  • Further discussion includes the equivalence of norms in finite-dimensional spaces and the differences in infinite-dimensional spaces, particularly in function spaces, where the three norms yield different sets of functions.
  • A participant expresses their current limitations in understanding these concepts, indicating they are new to linear algebra and self-studying.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement. While there is some consensus on the equivalence of norms in finite-dimensional spaces, there are differing views on the implications of the alternative norm definition and how to describe the corresponding geometric shapes.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of norms in infinite-dimensional spaces, noting that the existence of functions under different norms varies, which remains unresolved in the discussion.

neutrino
Messages
2,093
Reaction score
2
Here's a question from Apostol's Calculus Vol1

Suppose that instead of the usual definition of norm of a vector in [tex]V_n[/tex], we define it the following way,

[tex]||A|| = \sum_{k=1}^{n}|a_k|.[/tex]

Using this definition in [tex]V_2[/tex] describe on a figure the set of all points [tex](x,y)[/tex] of norm 1.


Is it possible to do that? Doesn't every point [tex](x,y)[/tex] of the form [tex](\frac{1}{s}, \frac{s-1}{s}), s \geq 1[/tex] satisfy the condition? (i.e., the number of points is not finite)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What has the number of points got to do with the ability to describe them? There are an uncountable number of points of normal norm one, and they are described as the unit circle.

If you just take the point (x,y) and consider the 4 cases of the signs of x and y you will see the answer quite easily (in particular, if x and y are both positive, it is the set { (t,1-t) : 0<=t <=1 }
 
Thank you. I knew I was forgetting something really simple. :redface:
 
By the way (this may be the next problem in Apostle!), the norm defined by [tex]||A||= max(|x_k|)[/tex] is also equivalent to the "usual" norm.

Where the set of all point p such that ||p||= 1, with the usual norm form a "ball" and the set of all points, ||p||= 1 ,with the norm you give, form a "diamond", the set of all points, ||p||= 1, with this norm, form a "cube".

The norms are equivalent since given any one, we can find a smaller of the other figures that will fit inside. For any neighborhood in one norm, there exist neighborhoods in the other norms that fit inside. Thus, open sets are identical in all 3 norms.

This is for finite dimensional space. Interestingly, for infinite dimensional spaces, such as function spaces, the 3 norms:
[tex]||f||=\sqrt{\int f(x)^2 dx}[/tex]
(The "L2" norm)
[tex]||f||= \int |f(x)|dx[/tex]
(The "L1" norm)
[tex]||f||= max |f(x)|[/tex]
(The "[itex]L_\infty[/itex]" norm)
do not give the same things. In fact, the sets of functions for which they exist are different.
 
HallsofIvy said:
By the way (this may be the next problem in Apostle!), the norm defined by [tex]||A||= max(|x_k|)[/tex] is also equivalent to the "usual" norm.

Indeed it is. :)

Where the set of all point p such that ||p||= 1, with the usual norm form a "ball" and the set of all points, ||p||= 1 ,with the norm you give, form a "diamond", the set of all points, ||p||= 1, with this norm, form a "cube".

The norms are equivalent since given any one, we can find a smaller of the other figures that will fit inside. For any neighborhood in one norm, there exist neighborhoods in the other norms that fit inside. Thus, open sets are identical in all 3 norms.

That is very interesting! Although it may not be very difficult to do it in V_3, I usually stick to V_2 for visualising these concepts.
Interestingly, for infinite dimensional spaces, such as function spaces, the 3 norms:
[tex]||f||=\sqrt{\int f(x)^2 dx}[/tex]
(The "L2" norm)
[tex]||f||= \int |f(x)|dx[/tex]
(The "L1" norm)
[tex]||f||= max |f(x)|[/tex]
(The "[itex]L_\infty[/itex]" norm)
do not give the same things. In fact, the sets of functions for which they exist are different.
Now, that is somewhat beyond what I can understand. I'm self-studying linear algebra (just begun, in fact), in a non-math-methods way limited to computing determinants and solving linear equations. But I'm sure I'll be able to appreciate this in the future. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K