Voids inside atoms and voids in space?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Monkey71Miaman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparison between the empty space within atoms, specifically the void between the nucleus and the electron cloud, and the vast intergalactic voids. Participants assert that while both types of voids are fundamentally "space," the implications of quantum mechanics (QM) complicate our understanding of these voids. The consensus is that, despite popular belief, the notion of atoms being primarily empty space is more nuanced than it seems, warranting further exploration of atomic structure and quantum principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of atomic structure, including nucleus and electron cloud.
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics principles.
  • Knowledge of astrophysics and the concept of intergalactic voids.
  • Awareness of common misconceptions regarding matter and empty space.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research quantum mechanics and its implications on atomic structure.
  • Explore the concept of intergalactic voids in astrophysics.
  • Investigate the recent discussions on atomic voids in physics forums.
  • Study the relationship between matter and empty space in modern physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in the fundamental nature of matter and the universe will benefit from this discussion.

Monkey71Miaman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
New to this blogging, forum internet stuff so bare with me.
Does anyone know if there is a similarity between the empty space separating the nucleus from the electron cloud of an atom, and the empty space found in the vast expanse of the inter galactic voids. The statement "Matter is composed mostly of empty space" implies they are the same. Is there anything special about this 'atomic void'
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "the same"? What characteristics did you have in mind when you are comparing them?

"Space" is space. Why would the space be any different? Granted, at some length scale, QM may have something to say about our ability to define what we mean by a "length", so the concept of "space" may require rethinking. However, based on our current understanding, and the formalism of the physics that we have used to describe atoms and celestial bodies, there is no difference.

Zz.
 
Note that the popular idea of atoms being made up mostly of empty space is actually much more complicated than it appears. I know we had a thread on it recently, so a forum search may be useful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
17K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K