Weyl ordering of the hamiltonian

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jack2013
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian Weyl
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Weyl ordering of the Hamiltonian as described in Srednicki's field theory book, specifically on page 68. It highlights that the ordering of operators is a quantization ambiguity without a classical counterpart, emphasizing that different ordering schemes can lead to varying physical interpretations. The Laplace-Beltrami operator is suggested as a unique operator ordering for a free particle on a curved manifold. The formula for Weyl ordering is presented as O(qn pm) ≡ 2-n Σ qn−i pm qi, where the sum runs from i=0 to n.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly operator theory.
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics and its applications.
  • Knowledge of curved manifolds and differential geometry.
  • Basic grasp of path integral formulation in quantum field theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Laplace-Beltrami operator in quantum mechanics.
  • Research various operator ordering schemes and their physical implications.
  • Explore Srednicki's field theory book, focusing on the context of Weyl ordering.
  • Learn about the path integral formulation and its advantages over Lagrangian methods.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and field theory, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of operator ordering and its implications in theoretical physics.

Jack2013
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi , I can't understand the general formula for weyl ordering of the hamiltonian . It is written in Srednicki field theory book in page 68 . Can someone explain how to derive this formula ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't derive a specific ordering of the Hamiltonian; the ordering of operators is a quantization ambiguity which has no classical counterpart. Usually you have p²/2m for the kinetic energy of a particle but there is no qm principle which tells you that (px)(p/x)/2m is wrong. Different ordering schemes may result in different physics and you have to use an additional, independent physical principle in orer to select the "correct" one.

In case of a curved manifold with a free particle moving on that manifold one reasonable idea is to use the Laplace-Beltrami operator as kinetic energy; this results in a unique operator ordering.

Perhaps Srednicki explains something like that ...
 
The Weyl ordering tries to define a general prescription for operator ordering: complete symmetrization.

O(qn pm) ≡ 2-n Σ qn−i pm qi where the sum runs i=0 to n.

But difficult questions like operator ordering are a reason that people turned away from Langrangian formulation and were led instead to path integrals.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K