Hello,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

sorry for my english..

I have a problem with weyl's spinors notation.

I'm confused, becouse i read more books (like Landau, Srednicki and Peskin) and it's seems to me that all of them use different and incompatible notations..

If i define

[itex]M=\exp\left(-\frac{1}{2}(i\theta+\beta)\sigma\right)[/itex]

as a generic lorentz transformation in left spinor rappresentation

if [itex] \psi_\alpha [/itex] represent left covariant spinor that transform with M

[itex] \psi^\alpha [/itex] represent left contravariant spinor that transform with M^(-1) right?

so how do i represent covariant and contravariant right spinor in dotted notation?

and how do they transform in connection with M matrix?

if i transform covariant left spinor with [itex]\epsilon^{\alpha\beta}[/itex] I obtain a contravariant left spinor or not?

the inner product involves dotted-dotted spinors (covariant and contravariant) or dotted-undotted spinors?

thank you :)

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Weyl spinor notation co/contravariant and un/dotted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Weyl spinor notation | Date |
---|---|

A Transformation of the spinor indices of the Weyl operator under the Lorentz group | Nov 18, 2016 |

Building a Lagrangian out of Weyl spinors | Feb 26, 2012 |

Tensor products of representation - Weyl spinors and 4vectors | Oct 24, 2011 |

Left and right-handed Weyl spinors | Feb 17, 2011 |

Left & right Weyl spinors | Nov 25, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**