What are some experimental errors associated with spectrophotommetry?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on identifying experimental errors in determining the equilibrium constant for the reaction Fe3+ + SCN- = FeSCN2+ using spectrophotometry. The participants utilized Fe(NO3)3 and KSCN as reagents, with absorbance measurements taken at 447 nm. Key concerns include the potential interference from KNO3 and K+ ions, which may reflect light and affect absorbance readings. Proper blanking of the spectrophotometer before measurements is emphasized as a critical step to minimize errors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chemical equilibrium and equilibrium constants
  • Familiarity with spectrophotometry and its principles
  • Knowledge of the role of blanking in spectrophotometric measurements
  • Basic chemistry knowledge regarding ionic compounds and their interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of ionic strength on spectrophotometric measurements
  • Learn about the principles of light reflection and absorption in solutions
  • Investigate methods for minimizing experimental errors in spectrophotometry
  • Explore the use of calibration curves in determining equilibrium constants
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for chemistry students, laboratory technicians, and researchers involved in analytical chemistry, particularly those working with spectrophotometric techniques and equilibrium studies.

omgwtfitsp
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
This isn't an actual calculation homework problem I'm having but rather a lab discussion.

I'm trying to find experimental errors of the experiment where you determine an equilibrium constant using spectrophotometry.

The reaction is: Fe 3+ + SCN - = FeSCN 2+

we used Fe(NO3)3 - iron (3) nitrate to supply Fe 3+
and KSCN - potassium thiocyanate to supply the SCN-

So in the final solution there would be some KNO3 i assume, and excess K+.


The only thing I can think of is possibly that, having those other ions in the solution when measuring absorbance of FeSCN2+ will affect the reading because those other ions ...reflect light? So far I tried looking and it came up often that KNO3 as K+ ion are clear and colourless so that means they reflect all light right?

So the spectrophotometer is set at 447 nm, where FeSCN2+ is sensitive to absorb.

So would what I said above be a reasonable source of error? I just thought that having ions that will reflect the 447 nm wavelength will affect the absorbance reading.

Are there other sources of errors and improvements one can make to this lab experiment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well did you blank the spec before using it to make a reading? Cause that could cause some issues. I blank it before every reading.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
32K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K