MHB What Conditions Make the Expectancy of Max{n-q, q-1} Equal to 3n/4?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Max
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the conditions under which the expected value of max{n-q, q-1} equals 3n/4, with n being a fixed number and q ranging from 0 to n. It establishes that for odd n, the expression for max{n-q, q-1} can be simplified based on the value of q. The expected value M is calculated using a summation approach, leading to the formula M = (n(3n - 1))/(4(n + 1)). The discussion emphasizes the relationship between the values of n and q in achieving the desired expectancy. The mathematical exploration seeks to clarify the conditions necessary for this equality to hold.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

When is the expectancy of $max \{n-q,q-1\}$ , where $n$ is a fixed number and $q$ is in $[0,n]$ , so $\max\{n-q,q-1 \}$ is in $[\frac{n}{2},n]$, equal to $\frac{\frac{n}{2}+n}{2}=\frac{3n}{4}$? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

When is the expectancy of $max \{n-q,q-1\}$ , where $n$ is a fixed number and $q$ is in $[0,n]$ , so $\max\{n-q,q-1 \}$ is in $[\frac{n}{2},n]$, equal to $\frac{\frac{n}{2}+n}{2}=\frac{3n}{4}$? (Thinking)

Let suppose n odd [the case n even is quite similar...], then...

$\displaystyle \max \{n - q, q - 1\} =\begin{cases}n - q &\text{if}\ q \le \frac{n-1}{2}\\ q - 1 &\text{if}\ q\ge \frac{n+1}{2}\end{cases}\ (1)$

If we call M the expected value of $\max \{n - q, q - 1\}$ then is...

$\displaystyle M = \frac{1}{n+1}\ \{\sum_{i=0}^{\frac{n-1}{2}} (n-i) + \sum_{i =\frac{n+1}{2}}^{n} (i-1)\} = \frac{n\ (3\ n - 1)}{4\ (n + 1)}\ (2)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
831
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K