What does Alain Connes think of Tegmark's hypothesis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Alain Connes, a prominent mathematician and mathematical physicist, advocates for Platonism, asserting that mathematics exists on par with physical reality. This perspective aligns closely with Max Tegmark's Mathematical Universe Hypothesis (MUH), which posits that every mathematically possible structure constitutes its own universe. Despite the similarities in their philosophical views, there is no documented commentary from Connes regarding Tegmark's hypothesis. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in distinguishing philosophical viewpoints from scientific models.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Platonism in mathematics
  • Familiarity with Max Tegmark's Mathematical Universe Hypothesis (MUH)
  • Basic knowledge of philosophical discourse in mathematics
  • Awareness of the distinction between philosophy and scientific modeling
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Alain Connes' contributions to mathematical Platonism
  • Explore Max Tegmark's works on the Mathematical Universe Hypothesis
  • Investigate the philosophical implications of mathematics in physical reality
  • Examine discussions on the intersection of philosophy and science in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers of mathematics, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the foundational aspects of mathematical reality and its implications in the physical universe.

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
The mathematician and mathematical physicist Alain Connes has expressed in many occasions that he is a Platonism and he thinks that mathematics itself does exist in the same level (or even in a "stronger" level) as physical reality.

This is very similar to Max Tegmark's hypothesis of the Mathematical Universe (MUH), which basically says that every mathematically possible structure exists as its own universe.

Since both approaches are almost identical, I was wondering if Connes has ever commented anything on Tegmark's views. I cannot find anything on the Internet, but since both ways of thinking are almost the same, it seems strange to me that Connes has not said anything about it. Does anyone know if Connes has commented anything on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you confuse the philosophical point of view with models that describe the universe according to what I found on the internet. I do not see how these two match in such a specific way.

Since we do not discuss philosophy on PF - there are more specialized places on the internet - this thread is closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
615
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 137 ·
5
Replies
137
Views
28K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K