What does Alain Connes think of Tegmark's hypothesis?

Click For Summary
Alain Connes, a prominent mathematician and mathematical physicist, advocates for a Platonist view of mathematics, suggesting that mathematical entities exist on par with physical reality. This perspective aligns closely with Max Tegmark's Mathematical Universe Hypothesis (MUH), which posits that all mathematically possible structures exist as distinct universes. The discussion raises curiosity about whether Connes has commented on Tegmark's ideas, but no information is readily available online. The conversation touches on the distinction between philosophical viewpoints and models describing the universe, leading to a closure of the thread due to the forum's focus on non-philosophical discussions.
Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
The mathematician and mathematical physicist Alain Connes has expressed in many occasions that he is a Platonism and he thinks that mathematics itself does exist in the same level (or even in a "stronger" level) as physical reality.

This is very similar to Max Tegmark's hypothesis of the Mathematical Universe (MUH), which basically says that every mathematically possible structure exists as its own universe.

Since both approaches are almost identical, I was wondering if Connes has ever commented anything on Tegmark's views. I cannot find anything on the Internet, but since both ways of thinking are almost the same, it seems strange to me that Connes has not said anything about it. Does anyone know if Connes has commented anything on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you confuse the philosophical point of view with models that describe the universe according to what I found on the internet. I do not see how these two match in such a specific way.

Since we do not discuss philosophy on PF - there are more specialized places on the internet - this thread is closed.
 
To some degree, this thread is inspired by PF user erobz's thread "Why do we spend so much time learning grammar in the public school system?" That's why I made a title to this thread that paralleled the title of erobz's thread. I totally disagree with erobz. I created this thread because the curriculum of grammar at Universities is a totally distinct topic from the topic of the curriculum of grammar in public schools. I have noticed that the English grammar of many ( perhaps most)...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
349
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 137 ·
5
Replies
137
Views
28K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K