What does inaction about existential threats tell us about....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Posty McPostface
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Climate change
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the inaction regarding existential threats such as climate change and asteroid impacts. Participants argue that while evidence supports human-induced climate change, predictive models are inadequate for determining effective mitigation strategies. The conversation highlights the need for improved modeling to guide productive actions. Additionally, advancements in asteroid detection and deflection technologies are acknowledged, suggesting a steady progress over time despite the long-term nature of the threat.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of climate change science and human impact
  • Familiarity with predictive modeling techniques
  • Knowledge of asteroid detection and deflection technologies
  • Awareness of philosophical implications of existential threats
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in climate modeling techniques
  • Explore technologies for asteroid detection and deflection
  • Study the psychological aspects of decision-making regarding long-term threats
  • Investigate philosophical frameworks surrounding existential risk
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, environmental scientists, policymakers, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of human response to existential threats.

Posty McPostface
Messages
27
Reaction score
7
What does inaction about existential threats tell us about ourselves?

Take for example climate change or the lack of any action to mitigate potentially civilization ending asteroid impacts?

Is this simply an issue related to our very way of being? And, if so what can be done about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Posty McPostface said:
What does inaction about existential threats tell us about ourselves?

Take for example climate change or the lack of any action to mitigate potentially civilization ending asteroid impacts?

Is this simply an issue related to our very way of being? And, if so what can be done about it?
I believe there is action on both.

On the first topic, in the case of climate change, although the evidence that global warming in created from human activity is very convincing (at least to me), the models are very poor at predicting exactly what activity creates what long-term quantitative effects - and what mitigation efforts would result in what improvements over what time period. If your only objective is to try to put things back as they were, then you can claim inaction. If your objective is to save mankind, the path is less clear.
So I would say that we urgently need to improve the models so we know where we're headed and how to steer a path that is most productive.

On the second topic, we are certainly developing the technologies we would need to find, deflect, and mine asteroids. We could advance the time line - but our pace is pretty good. Given that this is a problem that extends over hundreds of thousands of years - look how much progress we've made in that time frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeterDonis
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
I suppose there are many studies to which extend humans can make decisions and take action beyond their usual horizon of a lifetime. Thus the subject may be regarded under philosophical, political, social as well as under psychological aspects. But as a discussion out of the blue, it will probably lead nowhere, and none of these fields is really within our range of competence.

As the subject is mostly of philosophical nature, this thread will remain closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
891
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K