What does it mean for a theory to be renormalizable

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lemaho
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Renormalizability in theoretical physics indicates that a theory can be defined with only finite expressions or that infinities can be absorbed by redefining a finite number of quantities. A theory is deemed non-renormalizable if it requires infinitely many quantities to manage these infinities. The term is often misinterpreted as "perturbatively renormalizable," which can lead to misleading conclusions, as non-renormalizable behavior may arise from an unjustified perturbation expansion and could be resolved through non-perturbative methods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts
  • Familiarity with perturbation theory
  • Knowledge of scaling dimensions in physics
  • Basic grasp of infinities in mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of non-perturbative methods in quantum field theory
  • Study the role of scaling dimensions in renormalization
  • Explore examples of renormalizable and non-renormalizable theories
  • Learn about the renormalization group and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers interested in quantum field theory and the mathematical foundations of particle physics.

Lemaho
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I have a simple question with a possibly long answer.
What does it mean for a theory to be renormalizable. And how is it related to the scaling dimension?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Renormalizable means that either the theory contains only finite expressions or that infinities can be absorbed by redefining finitly many quantities. A theory is not renormalizable if you need infinitly many quantities to absorb the infinities.

Usually renormalizable is used in the sense of "perturbatively renormalizable", but this is misleading. It can very well be that a theory seems to be unrenormalizable when treated perturbatively, but this behavior can simply be due to the (unjustified) perturbation expansion and may vanish when treated non-perturbatively.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K