What does it mean for X and Y to be compared in terms of their expected values?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingwinner
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theorem stating that if X and Y are random variables defined on the same probability space Ω, then X ≤ Y implies E(X) ≤ E(Y). The term "X ≤ Y" means that for all ω in Ω, X(ω) must be less than or equal to Y(ω). The conversation also clarifies that to compute P(X ≤ Y), it is sufficient for X(ω) to be less than or equal to Y(ω) for almost all ω in Ω, not necessarily for all. Additionally, it is confirmed that X and Y must be on the same probability space for the probability measure P to be valid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of random variables and probability spaces
  • Familiarity with expected values and probability measures
  • Knowledge of order statistics and their notation
  • Basic concepts of measure theory in probability
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of expected values in probability theory
  • Learn about probability measures and their applications in statistics
  • Explore order statistics and their significance in statistical analysis
  • Investigate the implications of defining random variables on the same probability space
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data scientists, and students of probability theory seeking to deepen their understanding of random variables, expected values, and their relationships within probability spaces.

kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0
There is a theorem that says:
"Let X and Y be random variables. If X ≤ Y, then E(X) ≤ E(Y)."

But I don't really understand the meaning of "X ≤ Y". What does it mean?
For example, if X takes on the values 0,1,2,3, and Y takes on the values -1,2,5. Is X ≤ Y??

Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The theorem assumes that X and Y are defined on the same probability space \Omega. X\leq Y means X(\omega)\leq Y(\omega),\quad \forall\omega\in\Omega. Actually, it would be enough to have X(\omega)\leq Y(\omega) for P-almost all \omega\in\Omega, where P is the probability measure on [itex\Omega][/itex].
 
Pere Callahan said:
The theorem assumes that X and Y are defined on the same probability space \Omega. X\leq Y means X(\omega)\leq Y(\omega),\quad \forall\omega\in\Omega. Actually, it would be enough to have X(\omega)\leq Y(\omega) for P-almost all \omega\in\Omega, where P is the probability measure on [itex\Omega][/itex].
Thanks! Now I understand what X ≤ Y means in the theorem.

Consider a separate problem. How about X ≤ Y in the context of finding P(X ≤ Y)? In this case, do X any Y have to be defined as random variables with X(\omega) < Y(\omega) for ALL \omega\in\Omega?
 
Last edited:
No. In order to compute P(X ≤ Y), you have to take the probability of all omega such that X(omega) ≤ Y(omega). There might be other omega which do not satisfy this inequality but then they don't contribute to P(X ≤ Y).

<br /> P(X\leq Y)=P\left(\omega\in\Omega: X(\omega)\leq Y(\omega)\right)<br />

You may have noticed that the probability measure P has strictly speaking two different meanings here. On the right hand side it is a function which takes as argument a subset of \Omega. While on the left hand side...well...it is only a shorthand for the right side:smile:
 
Thanks! I love your explanations!
 
Two follow-up questions:

1) For P(X ≤ Y), do X and Y have to be defined on the SAME sample space \Omega?

2) In order statistics, when they say X(1)≤X(2)≤...≤X(n), they actually mean X(1)(ω)≤X(2)(ω)≤...≤X(n)(ω) for each and for all ω E \Omega (or almost all), right??
 
kingwinner said:
Two follow-up questions:

1) For P(X ≤ Y), do X and Y have to be defined on the SAME sample space \Omega?

They need to be on the same probability space. Having the same sample space is not enough.
2) In order statistics, when they say X(1)≤X(2)≤...≤X(n), they actually mean X(1)(ω)≤X(2)(ω)≤...≤X(n)(ω) for each and for all ω E \Omega (or almost all), right??

If they don't say a.e. or a.s. you can assume they mean for all \omega \in \Omega.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K