What Does R^m -> R^n Mean in Notation?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Astrum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the notation Rm → Rn, specifically its meaning in the context of functions between vector spaces. Participants explore the implications of this notation in both theoretical and practical applications.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the meaning of the notation Rm → Rn.
  • Another participant explains that it denotes a function from the space Rm to the space Rn, where Rm represents the m-dimensional real vector space.
  • A participant suggests that this could involve transforming a vector from R3 to R4 as an example.
  • Further elaboration includes a mathematical representation of the function and its mapping, detailing how inputs from Rm yield outputs in Rn.
  • Participants are encouraged to visualize functions through graphing examples, such as mapping from R2 to R and from R to R2.
  • There is a mention of linear functions within the context of linear algebra.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the basic interpretation of the notation as representing functions between vector spaces, but there is no explicit consensus on the specific examples or implications discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the dimensionality and properties of the vector spaces are not fully explored, and the discussion does not resolve the implications of linearity in the context of the functions mentioned.

Astrum
Messages
269
Reaction score
5
Notation question - R^m ---> r^n

I've come across this notation a lot lately. I'm not sure what it really means.

[itex]R^{m} \rightarrow R^{n}[/itex]

I can't find the place in my book where it explains it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means a function from the space Rm to the space Rn.

Rm is the m dimensional real vector space, or sometimes more concretely the space

{(x1, ..., xm) | xi in ℝ}
 
Hm, so you mean turning a vector in R3 to R4 as a concrete example?
 
Yep.
 
We can write
\begin{align}
f:\mathbb{R}^m&\to\mathbb{R}^n\\
x&\mapsto y=f(x)
\end{align}
and
\begin{align}
y&=(y_1,\dots,y_n)\\
&=f(x)\\
&=f(x_1,\dots,x_m)\\
&=(f_1(x),\dots,f_n(x))\\
&=(f_1(x_1,\dots,x_m),\dots,f_n(x_1,\dots,x_m)).
\end{align}
Try drawing the graphs of the functions
\begin{align}
f:\mathbb{R}^2&\to\mathbb{R}\\
(x,y)&\mapsto z=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}
\end{align}
and
\begin{align}
f:\mathbb{R}&\to\mathbb{R}^2\\
x&\mapsto (y,z)=(\cos x,\sin x).
\end{align}
The graph associated with the map [itex]f:A\to B[/itex] is denoted [itex]\Gamma_f[/itex] and is a subset of the product space [itex]A\times B[/itex].

Linear algebra considers the case that f is linear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K