What doyou think about Reactor's Rubbia?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lo_sconosciuto
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Reactor's Rubbia, specifically the "rubbiatron," a subcritical reactor designed for the transmutation of nuclear waste using a proton-driven thorium fission process. This method utilizes a small proton accelerator and a lead target to produce neutrons, which interact with thorium, resulting in decay into other elements. The advantages highlighted include the elimination of meltdown risk due to the necessity of a proton beam for reaction initiation and the production of waste with significantly shorter half-lives. The potential of thorium as a more abundant alternative to uranium is also emphasized, with estimates suggesting that the planet contains 550 times more thorium than uranium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of proton-driven nuclear reactions
  • Familiarity with thorium fission processes
  • Knowledge of nuclear waste transmutation techniques
  • Basic concepts of decay chains in nuclear physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the operational principles of subcritical reactors
  • Explore the environmental benefits of thorium over uranium
  • Investigate current advancements in proton accelerator technology
  • Learn about the implications of nuclear waste management strategies
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, environmental scientists, policymakers in energy sectors, and anyone interested in innovative nuclear waste solutions and thorium energy potential.

Lo_sconosciuto
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
It use small accelerator of protons and target of lead.
The lead give out neutrons, these neutrons go to thorio.
The thorio decay in other elements that now I don't know.
Does some body know this elements ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I saw.
Thanks
 
he refers to the "rubbiatron" or "rubiatron", a subcritical reactor oriented to transmutation of nuclear trash.
 
I think proton driven thorium fission is a really nice idea. No chance of meltdown since it isn't a runaway reaction (it needs to be driven by the proton beam) and waste products with much shorter half-lives.

I must admit to initially being put off by it being promoted by Carlo Rubbia, since he can be a bit odd, but I chatted with him about it in Stockholm not too long ago, and he convinced me that it is a nice idea.
 
Last edited:
I've always felt that our old nuclear waste would one day be considered valuable, and that trying to hide it underground for 100,000 years was unnecessary.

And the planet has 550 times as much thorium as uranium.

http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/348/
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K