What is a Parallel Unit Vector and How is it Calculated?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of parallel unit vectors, specifically how they are calculated by dividing a vector by its magnitude. Participants explore the definitions, properties, and implications of parallel vectors and unit vectors, touching on both theoretical and mathematical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants clarify that dividing a vector by its magnitude produces a unit vector parallel to the original vector, emphasizing that this operation scales the vector without changing its direction.
  • One participant provides an example using the vector (3, 4) to demonstrate the calculation of its magnitude and the resulting unit vector.
  • Another participant questions why dividing by the magnitude specifically yields a unit vector, noting that any scalar division would also produce a parallel vector.
  • Some participants discuss the definition of parallel vectors, stating that they can be expressed as multiples of each other, indicating linear dependence.
  • Several participants inquire about the algebraic proof of why dividing a vector by its magnitude results in a parallel unit vector, suggesting various approaches to demonstrate this relationship.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definition and calculation of unit vectors and their parallel nature to the original vectors. However, there is some debate regarding the necessity of dividing by the magnitude specifically, as opposed to any scalar, leaving the discussion somewhat unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions of vectors and operations are not explicitly stated, and the discussion does not resolve the question of whether any scalar division results in a parallel vector.

I_am_no1
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
What PARALLEL UNIT VECTORS are and Why i got to divide a vector with its value to get a PARALLEL UNIT VECTOR ?
This way
[tex]\hat{a}[/tex] = [tex]\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A}[/tex]
/|[tex]\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A}[/tex]
| ?

I am sure that the answere would be very easy but i am such a . . . ! Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, we usually don't use the word "value" to denote the magnitude or length of a vector. Just use the phrase "magnitude of a vector" and people will know what you mean.

So your question is why does dividing a vector [tex]\vec{V}[/tex] by its magnitude [tex]|\vec V|[/tex] produce a unit vector [tex]\hat V[/tex] parallel to the original vector?

First understand the parallel part. Whenever your multiply or divide a vector by a number you are simply scaling the vector leaving its direction unchanged. Thus a two-dimensional vector with components (6, 8) is parallel to the vector (3, 4) and has twice the magnitude.

Next understand the unit part. Consider the vector with components (3, 4). Its magnitude is
[tex](3^2 + 4^2)^{1/2} = 5[/tex]. Hence the vector divided by its magnitude is (3/5, 4/5). The claim is that this vector has unit magnitude. Just check it: [tex][(3/5)^2 + (4/5)^2]^{1/2} = [9/25 + 16/25]^{1/2} = (25/25)^{1/2} = 1.[/tex]
 
For two vectors to be "parallel" just means they point in the same direction. That's all.

Multiplying by a scalar (such as the magnitude of the vector) does not change the vector's direction, only its magnitude. So there you go.
 
Yes, if P (3,4) then[tex]\stackrel{\rightarrow}{OP}[/tex] = 3[tex]\hat{i}[/tex] + 4[tex]\hat{j}[/tex]
so parallel unit vector of [tex]\stackrel{\rightarrow}{OP}[/tex], would be [tex]\stackrel{\rightarrow}{OR}[/tex] = [tex]\stackrel{\rightarrow}{OP}[/tex]/|[tex]\stackrel{\rightarrow}{OP}[/tex]|
=(3[tex]\hat{i}[/tex] + 4[tex]\hat{j}[/tex])/[tex]\sqrt[]{3^2 + 4^2}[/tex]
=(3[tex]\hat{i}[/tex] + 4[tex]\hat{j}[/tex])/5
=3/5[tex]\hat{i}[/tex] + 4/5[tex]\hat{j}[/tex]

equation of OP is (x - 3) / (3 - 0) = (y - 4) / (4 - 0)
=>4x = 3y
equation of OR is (x - 3/5) / (3/5 - 0) = (y - 4/5) / (4/5 - 0)
=>20x = 15y
=>4x = 3y
so OP and OR is parallel without any doubt but why we are dividing with its magnitude ? If we divide with 2, 3, 4 or any other number that time also there will be a parallel vector visible, not?
 
Thanks thanks thanks i have solved the problem !
When we divide one vector with its magnitude we get a UNIT VECTOR so [tex]\hat{n}[/tex] = [tex]\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A}[/tex]/|[tex]\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A}[/tex]| and this unit vector must be parallel to [tex]\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A}[/tex].

So we divide one vector with its magnitude is to calculate a unit vector and automatically they are parallel!
 
is it possible to prove algebraically that dividing any vector by its magnitude results in a parallel unit vector?
 
what does it mean for two vectors to be parallel? one of them can be written as a multible of the other. or in other words, they are linearly dependent, so there exists a nontrivial linear combination equal to zero.

let a be such a vector, and let u be the unit vector acquired as follows [tex]u=\frac{a}{|a|}[/tex]

then it is clear that:


na+mu=0, where n and m are different from zero.

or a=ku, with k=|a|.

so a and u are linearly dependent, or parallel.

it is also clear that u is the unit vector, since |u|=1.
 
2^Oscar said:
is it possible to prove algebraically that dividing any vector by its magnitude results in a parallel unit vector?

Assuming you know that for scalar a and vector A that

| kA | = |k| |A|

apply that to:

( 1/|A|)A
 
2^Oscar said:
is it possible to prove algebraically that dividing any vector by its magnitude results in a parallel unit vector?

Any vector parallel to xi+yj can be written as α(xi+yj)=αxi+αyj where α= scalar

Unit vector means the magnitude of the vector you want is 1

so


[tex]\left | \alpha x \hat{i}+ \alpha \hat{j} \right |= \sqrt{(\alpha x)^2 + (\alpha y)^2}=1[/tex]


So your scalar α works out to be equal to

[tex]\alpha = \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}[/tex]

this means to obtain a unit vector, you divide the vector by its magnitude
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K