What is the average value of an observable in a quantum system?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the average value of an observable in a quantum system, specifically focusing on the mathematical formulation and implications of measuring observables in different states. It explores theoretical aspects and conceptual clarifications related to quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the average value of an observable ##\hat{A}## in state ##\psi## is defined as ##(\psi,\hat{A}\psi)## instead of a scaled version like ##26(\psi,\hat{A}\psi)##.
  • Another participant suggests that if the state ##\psi## is an eigenstate of the observable ##A##, then the average value simplifies to the eigenvalue ##a##, as expressed by ##(\psi,\hat{A}\psi)=a##.
  • There is a reiteration that when in an eigenstate, the average value is not a scaled version but the eigenvalue itself, emphasizing that it is ##a##, not ##26a##.
  • A participant raises a concern about the average value of energy when the system is in a non-eigenstate ##\phi(x)##, questioning how to ensure that the average value is still given by ##(\phi(x),\hat{H}\phi(x))##.
  • Another participant introduces the expectation value as ##=∑npnEn## and connects it to the Born rule, suggesting that the average value can be expressed as ##<ψ|H|ψ>##.
  • The discussion includes a clarification that any general state ##\phi(x)## can be expressed in terms of eigenfunctions, which leads to the conclusion that the average value will still be ##(\phi(x),\hat{H}\phi(x))##.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of measuring observables in eigenstates versus non-eigenstates. While some points are clarified, the discussion remains unresolved regarding the general case of average values in non-eigenstates.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference mathematical formulations and concepts such as eigenstates, eigenvalues, and the Born rule, which may depend on specific definitions and assumptions in quantum mechanics. The discussion does not resolve the complexities involved in measuring observables in arbitrary states.

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Why we define that average value of some observable ##\hat{A}## in state ##\psi## is
##(\psi,\hat{A}\psi)##
Why this isnot perhaps
##26(\psi,\hat{A}\psi)##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What if the state ψ was an eigenstate of the observable A?
 
In that case ##\hat{A}\psi=a\psi##,
so
##(\psi,\hat{A}\psi)=a##.
 
LagrangeEuler said:
In that case ##\hat{A}\psi=a\psi##,
so
##(\psi,\hat{A}\psi)=a##.
Right, where ##a## is the eigenvalue of the observable. Not ##26a##!
 
Tnx.
 
But still after I think. Ok. When the system is in some eigen- state ##\varphi_n##, we measure energy ##E_n##. So
##(\varphi_n,\hat{H}\varphi_n)=E_n##
but if system is in some other state, perhaps, ##\phi(x)## which is not eigenstate of observable ##\hat{H}## how I can be sure that average value of energy is
##(\phi(x),\hat{H}\phi(x))##?
 
The expectation value can be defined as <H>=∑npnEn. If you use Born's rule for the pn you get <ψ|H|ψ>.
 
LagrangeEuler said:
But still after I think. Ok. When the system is in some eigen- state ##\varphi_n##, we measure energy ##E_n##. So
##(\varphi_n,\hat{H}\varphi_n)=E_n##
but if system is in some other state, perhaps, ##\phi(x)## which is not eigenstate of observable ##\hat{H}## how I can be sure that average value of energy is
##(\phi(x),\hat{H}\phi(x))##?
You can express the general state ##\phi(x)## in terms of the eigenfunctions: ##\phi(x)## = ##a_1\varphi_1## + ##a_2\varphi_2## ...
where ##a_n^*a_n## represents the probability of measuring ##E_n##. Thus the average value will be ##(\phi(x),\hat{H}\phi(x))##.

(This is equivalent to what kith just said about using the Born rule.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
426
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K