What is the Controversy Surrounding the Obama-Joker Face Meme?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Helios
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the controversial Obama-Joker face meme created by artist Firas Alkhateeb, exploring its implications, interpretations, and the reactions it has elicited in the context of political discourse and social phenomena. The scope includes conceptual analysis, social commentary, and reactions to the meme's usage in protests and media.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe the meme as an amusing social phenomenon, while others criticize it as a reflection of ignorance among protesters.
  • Warren notes that the image has been widely posted in Berkeley and suggests it conveys a topical message about socialism.
  • There are claims that Alkhateeb created the image as a Photoshop tutorial, and some participants argue that he did not intend a political message.
  • Concerns are raised about the violent symbolism associated with depicting Obama as the Joker, with references to racial fears.
  • Some participants express frustration with the political implications of the meme and its association with right-wing figures like Limbaugh and Palin.
  • There is a suggestion that the meme's usage in protests reflects a broader political discourse rather than the original intent of the creator.
  • Participants express differing views on whether the meme is disrespectful or a legitimate form of political expression.
  • Some participants question the relevance of the meme in political discussions, suggesting it oversimplifies complex issues.
  • There are mixed reactions regarding the understanding of the meme, with some stating they do not grasp its significance, possibly due to unfamiliarity with the Batman movie context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express multiple competing views regarding the meme's significance, intent, and appropriateness in political discourse. There is no consensus on its implications or the motivations behind its creation and usage.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate that the meme's interpretation may depend on individual perspectives and political affiliations, highlighting the complexity of its reception in different contexts.

Helios
Messages
267
Reaction score
63
Artist Firas Alkhateeb, a 20-year-old college student from Chicago has created a controversial masterpiece: the Obama-Joker face. The caption "Socialism" was later applied to his picture. The image is becoming ubiquitous at healthcare protest as well as being posted randomly all over the country. Whatever the interpretation is of this work, it is an amusing social phenomenon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Helios said:
Artist Firas Alkhateeb, a 20-year-old college student from Chicago has created a controversial masterpiece: the Obama-Joker face. The caption "Socialism" was later applied to his picture. The image is becoming ubiquitous at healthcare protest as well as being posted randomly all over the country. Whatever the interpretation is of this work, it is an amusing social phenomenon.

Uh..so no link?
 
An interesting social phenomenon? There is nothing interesting about people who don't even know what they are opposing. Just more nonsense from the Limbaugh/Palin crowd.

Congress is writing the reform plans, not Obama.
 
I've seen it posted all over Berkeley, near the University and down in the Gourmet Ghetto. I got a chuckle out of it, and it's a somewhat topical message. Socialism often goes awry in practice, and our government is closer than it has ever been to true socialism. We should never let our guard down, even during periods of relative trust.

- Warren
 
The kid, Alkhateeb, that did the original says he did it as a tutorial on the use of photoshop and said the picture was stolen off of his flickr site.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
Just more nonsense from the Limbaugh/Palin crowd.

Your knee-jerk judgments always amaze me, Ivan. The guy who created it is Palestinian, and actually supports and praises Obama.

His message is not right-wing, it is libertarian. I see his point, but I also hold mostly libertarian views.

- Warren
 
And by "created it," I mean the message, by whomever put the word "Socialism" under it. I can accept that Alkhateeb had no political message in mind.

- Warren
 
A Florida teenager could find himself in a sticky situation as a state attorney prepares to review possible felony vandalism charges in connection to the posters depicting President Obama as the Joker, FOXNews.com has learned.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/18/felony-vandalism-charges-mulled-obama-joker-poster-case/

I am not sure if the last posted link referred to this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
chroot said:
I've seen it posted all over Berkeley, near the University and down in the Gourmet Ghetto. I got a chuckle out of it, and it's a somewhat topical message. Socialism often goes awry in practice, and our government is closer than it has ever been to true socialism. We should never let our guard down, even during periods of relative trust.

- Warren
I'll give you that about socialism, but I don't see how it conveys such a message. I'm not a big fan of Obama or socialism, but I think it's kinda dumb.
 
  • #11
Evo said:
The kid, Alkhateeb, that did the original says he did it as a tutorial on the use of photoshop and said the picture was stolen off of his flickr site.
Now that's ironic!
 
  • #12
Ivan Seeking said:
Congress is writing the reform plans, not Obama.
Well that's just purposely obtuse, Ivan. Health care reform was a central part of his campaign platform and as President, if Congress is leading the reform plans, that's a failure by Obama to lead. I know you're not naive enough for that, so all I can conclude is you're trying to put some distance between Obama and the current failure of the plan to be popular and pass (so far).
 
  • #13
Evo said:
Apparently not viral. I never heard of it. Never in any mainstream news sources I read all day. Now that I've searched on it.. HOW STUPID.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/05/AR2009080503876.html
I heard about it on the radio a week or two ago when people first started noticing and have seen it several times online since. I don't think many news sources found it very interesting.


Ivan Seeking said:
An interesting social phenomenon? There is nothing interesting about people who don't even know what they are opposing. Just more nonsense from the Limbaugh/Palin crowd.

Congress is writing the reform plans, not Obama.
I'm not sure that it was orginally a political message at all, I think it was just a picture that someone was posting up for fun. Someone had already done a Bush Joker around the time the movie came out.
 
  • #14
chroot said:
I've seen it posted all over Berkeley, near the University and down in the Gourmet Ghetto. I got a chuckle out of it, and it's a somewhat topical message. Socialism often goes awry in practice, and our government is closer than it has ever been to true socialism. We should never let our guard down, even during periods of relative trust.

- Warren

Your government is still a million miles from true socialism. Perhaps moving left and coming a little closer to the centre would do your nation more good than harm?
 
  • #15
This is politics.

Get this crap off of GD. Even mentors here who show great intelligence in matters of science and have shown the capability of understanding nuances of complicated and difficult situations in other matters, are reduced to spouting oversimplified explanations and condemnations fed from opposing wing "opinion sources." It is embarrassing to read.
 
  • #16
Hmmm... I wonder which of us should feel embarrassed about being different from Chi Meson.

- Warren
 
  • #17
chroot said:
Your knee-jerk judgments always amaze me, Ivan. The guy who created it is Palestinian, and actually supports and praises Obama.

His message is not right-wing, it is libertarian. I see his point, but I also hold mostly libertarian views.

- Warren

I'm talking about the way it is used; talking about knee-jerk reactions. This was even referenced specifically in the op. Who made it or why really doesn't matter. Watch any anti-Obama gig and you'll see this and Hitler-Obama. If feeds right into the Palin/Limbaugh crowd.

I also don't appreciate his defacing of our President. No matter his intentions, it is disrespecful and probably a cheap ploy for attention.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Chi Meson said:
This is politics.

Get this crap off of GD. Even mentors here who show great intelligence in matters of science and have shown the capability of understanding nuances of complicated and difficult situations in other matters, are reduced to spouting oversimplified explanations and condemnations fed from opposing wing "opinion sources." It is embarrassing to read.

If you read the posting guidelines, which was written by the staff, you would see that this thread really does not meet the requirements for a thread in politics. Also, personal opinions are allowed in GD. I'm sorry if you don't approve of that.
 
  • #19
I saw the picture but I just didn't get it. Maybe because I didn't see the Batman movie.
 
  • #20
Ivan Seeking said:
If you read the posting guidelines, which was written by the staff, you would see that this thread really does not meet the requirements for a thread in politics. Also, personal opinions are allowed in GD. I'm sorry if you don't approve of that.
Actually, the political comments after the OP does make it more suitable for discussion in P&WA.
 
  • #21
Math Is Hard said:
I saw the picture but I just didn't get it. Maybe because I didn't see the Batman movie.

I've seen it and still don't really get it either. The only thing I can conjure is that maybe they are trying to use to depict him as the bogey man.

Ivan said:
I also don't appreciate his defacing of our President. No matter his intentions, it is disrespecful and probably a cheap ploy for attention.
Did you care when it was Bush?
 
  • #22
What's the difference between this nonsense and the Obama sneakers and basketballs being sold on 30 second cable spots? It's all disgraceful.
 
  • #24
TheStatutoryApe said:
Did you care when it was Bush?

No so much because he betrayed the country by trashing the Constitution; or at least he did implicitly by allowing others to do so. He earned and deserved disrespect. But I would still never support something like this directed at any President.
 
  • #25
Ivan Seeking said:
I also don't appreciate his defacing of our President. No matter his intentions, it is disrespecful and probably a cheap ploy for attention.

Since when did it become socially unacceptable to "deface" the president? His face was not disfigured, it was just painted to look like the Joker's face; It is and has always been an american tradition to draw exaggerated caricatures of politicians and this tradition will continued with obama in office;
 
  • #26
Ivan Seeking said:
No so much because he betrayed the country by trashing the Constitution; or at least he did implicitly by allowing others to do so. He earned and deserved disrespect. But I would still never support something like this directed at any President.
So basically, when you (Ivan) have a negative opinion about someone, it is ok if anyone insults them but when you (Ivan) have a positive opinion about someone it is not ok for people to insult them?

Do you see any logical or constitutional problems with that position, Ivan...? :rolleyes:

1. Unless you're God (or even a judge), you're not the arbiter of good or bad.
2. That doesn't jive with the concept of free speech.

In any case, I'm glad you acknowledged the double standard - saves me the trouble of digging up year-old quotes from you insulting Bush!

Also, just so we're clear:
I also don't appreciate his defacing of our President.
"our President" is generic, but really what you mean is 'a president I like', right? Or can this just be covered by saying things like that Bush wasn't your president?
But I would still never support something like this directed at any President.
Now I'm confused - you wouldn't support it against any president, but it was ok against Bush...?
 
Last edited:
  • #27
...Now might also be a good time to point out that politicians (president, mayor, whatever) are not covered by slander/libel law. That's a pretty critical part of freedom of speech.
 
  • #28
Ivan Seeking said:
No so much because he betrayed the country by trashing the Constitution; or at least he did implicitly by allowing others to do so. He earned and deserved disrespect. But I would still never support something like this directed at any President.

In the context of the Constitution, does the creation of SO MANY additional CZARs concern you. People who answer only to Obama, and not approved/reviewed by Congress. Please don't name Bush CZARs, Obama has taken it to a whole new level.

Do you think the "Shadow Government" label is fair?
 
  • #29
It could have been worse:

i-like-turtles_188.jpg
 
  • #30
chroot said:
The guy who created it is Palestinian, and actually supports and praises Obama.
In regard to the latter part of your statement, I've seen http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/08/obama-joker-artist.html" :
"After Obama was elected, you had all of these people who basically saw him as the second coming of Christ," Alkhateeb said. "From my perspective, there wasn't much substance to him."
"I abstained from voting in November," he wrote in an e-mail. "Living in Illinois, my vote means close to nothing as there was no chance Obama would not win the state." If he had to choose a politician to support, Alkhateeb said, it would be Ohio Democratic Rep. Dennis Kucinich.
So I am curious, how did you come to your conclusion?
russ_watters said:
So basically, when you (Ivan) have a negative opinion about someone, it is ok if anyone insults them but when you (Ivan) have a positive opinion about someone it is not ok for people to insult them?
No. Basically; Ivan considers defacing the image of any President "disrespecful and probably a cheap ploy for attention", though it doesn't consern him as much in the case of one who "betrayed the country by trashing the Constitution".
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K