What is the maximum sum of products of consecutive integers from 1 to n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2016
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The maximum sum of products of consecutive integers from 1 to n is given by the formula \( S(n) = n(n+1)/2 \) for \( n \geq 2 \). This result is derived from the cyclic nature of the products \( x_1x_2 + x_2x_3 + \cdots + x_{n-1}x_n + x_nx_1 \). The solution was presented in the context of Problem B-3 from the 1996 William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition, highlighting its mathematical significance and complexity. Kiran Kedlaya and his associates provided the proof, demonstrating the systematic approach to solving such combinatorial problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combinatorial mathematics
  • Familiarity with cyclic sums
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical proofs
  • Experience with competitive mathematics, particularly the Putnam Competition format
NEXT STEPS
  • Study combinatorial optimization techniques
  • Explore advanced topics in cyclic sums and their applications
  • Review mathematical proof strategies used in competitions
  • Analyze previous Putnam Competition problems for similar patterns
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, competitive mathematicians, and educators interested in combinatorial problem-solving and optimization techniques.

Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

Given that $\{x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n\} = \{1, 2, \ldots, n\}$, find,
with proof, the largest possible value, as a function of $n$ (with $n
\geq 2$), of
\[
x_1x_2 + x_2x_3 + \cdots + x_{n-1}x_n + x_nx_1.
\]

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Problem Of The Week # 226 - Jul 27, 2016

This was Problem B-3 in the 1996 William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition.

No one answered this week's POTW. The solution, attributed to Kiran Kedlaya and his associates, follows:

View $x_1, \dots, x_n$ as an arrangement of the numbers $1, 2, \dots,n$ on a circle. We prove that the optimal arrangement is
\[
\dots, n-4, n-2, n, n-1, n-3, \dots
\]
To show this, note that if $a, b$ is a pair of adjacent numbers and $c,d$ is another pair (read in the same order around the circle) with $a < d$ and $b > c$, then the segment from $b$ to $c$ can be reversed, increasing the sum by
\[
ac + bd - ab - cd = (d-a)(b-c) > 0.
\]
Now relabel the numbers so they appear in order as follows:
\[
\dots, a_{n-4}, a_{n-2}, a_n = n, a_{n-1}, a_{n-3}, \dots
\]
where without loss of generality we assume $a_{n-1} > a_{n-2}$. By considering the pairs $a_{n-2}, a_n$ and $a_{n-1}, a_{n-3}$ and using the trivial fact $a_n > a_{n-1}$, we deduce $a_{n-2} > a_{n-3}$. We then compare the pairs $a_{n-4}, a_{n-2}$ and $a_{n-1}, a_{n-3}$, and using that $a_{n-1} > a_{n-2}$, we deduce $a_{n-3} > a_{n-4}$. Continuing in this fashion, we prove that $a_n > a_{n-1} > \dots > a_1$ and so $a_k = k$ for $k = 1, 2, \dots, n$, i.e. that the optimal arrangement is as claimed. In particular, the maximum value of the sum is
\begin{aligned}
1 \cdot 2 &+ (n-1)\cdot n + 1 \cdot 3 + 2 \cdot 4 + \cdots + (n-2)\cdot n
&= 2 + n^2 - n + (1^2 - 1) + \cdots + [(n-1)^2 - 1] \\
&= n^2 - n + 2 - (n-1) + \frac{(n-1)n(2n-1)}{6} \\
&= \frac{2n^3 + 3n^2 - 11n + 18}{6}.
\end{aligned}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K