What is the relationship between Coulomb's gauge and Maxwell's Lagrangian?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between Coulomb's gauge and Maxwell's Lagrangian, exploring the mathematical differentiation of determinants in the context of non-linear electrodynamics and its connection to Maxwell's theory. Participants are seeking advice on deriving equations of motion from a given Lagrangian.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in differentiating a determinant related to their Lagrangian and seeks advice.
  • Another participant suggests writing down the terms of the determinant and differentiating, noting that many diagonals should be zero.
  • A participant presents a mathematical expression involving the determinant and proposes using a matrix calculator for assistance.
  • There is a reference to the Born-Infeld theory and a specific identity related to the determinant of a matrix involving the metric and field tensors.
  • One participant questions whether, by considering Coulomb's gauge, they would arrive at the same equation of motion as Maxwell's Lagrangian.
  • Another participant clarifies that the Lagrangian describes non-linear electrodynamics and tends to Maxwell’s theory in the weak field limit, suggesting that imposing a gauge is unnecessary.
  • There is a suggestion that the original poster should have posted their question in the relativity forum for better responses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and approaches to the problem, with some suggesting methods for differentiation while others debate the necessity of gauge conditions. No consensus is reached on the relationship between the equations of motion derived from the Lagrangian and those of Maxwell's theory.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the complexity of the determinant differentiation and the potential for misunderstanding in the mathematical steps involved. The discussion also reflects a lack of clarity on the implications of using Coulomb's gauge.

vahdaneh
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
i need to differentiate a determinant in my way to finding the equation of motion of my Lagrangian.
2.jpg

i'll be grateful for any advice I've already tried using
3.jpg

but it just gets massive and makes me get lost.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would go the troublesome way: write down the 24 terms of the determinant and differentiate. Many diagonals should be zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vahdaneh
fresh_42 said:
I would go the troublesome way: write down the 24 terms of the determinant and differentiate. Many diagonals should be zero.
4.jpg
 
I'm no physicist so I considered it mathematically. The expression is basically
$$
\dfrac{\partial}{\partial x_{\mu \vartheta}}\left(-\dfrac{1}{b^4}\cdot \det \begin{bmatrix}b&x_{12}-x_{21}&x_{13}-x_{31}&x_{14}-x_{41}\\x_{21}-x_{12}&-b&x_{23}-x_{32}&x_{24}-x_{42}\\x_{31}-x_{13}&x_{32}-x_{23}&-b&x_{34}-x_{43}\\x_{41}-x_{14}&x_{42}-x_{24}&x_{43}-x_{34}&-b\end{bmatrix} \right)
$$
which is a big, but easy polynomial to differentiate. Maybe the matrix calculator here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...th-and-other-curiosities.970262/#post-6164027will do it for you. Or you just consider the relevant of the 24 diagonals, i.e. those which have ##x_{\mu \vartheta}## in it, since the others become zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vahdaneh
vahdaneh said:
Summary: i need to differentiate a determinant in my way to finding the equation of motion of my Lagrangian.
i'll be grateful for any advice
Try looking up the literatures on the Born-Infield theory for the (highly non-trivial) proof of the following identity (in 4 dimensions)
- \mbox{Det} \left( g_{\mu\nu} + F_{\mu\nu}\right) = -g \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2} g^{\mu\rho}g^{\nu\sigma}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\rho\sigma} - ( \frac{1}{8} \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\rho\sigma})^2 \right) , \ \ \ (1) where g = \mbox{Det} (g_{\alpha \beta}). Now, if that is your Lagrangian \mathcal{L}, then \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\alpha}A_{\beta})} = 2 \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial F_{\alpha \beta}} , and the equation of motion is just \partial_{\alpha} \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial F_{\alpha \beta}} \right) = 0. So, from the identity (1), you find \partial_{\alpha} \left( F^{\alpha \beta} - \frac{1}{4} \left( F_{\mu\nu} ~^*\!F^{\mu\nu} \right) ~^*\!F^{\alpha\beta}\right) = 0, where ~^*\!F^{\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}F_{\rho\sigma}.

You should have posted this in the Relativity forum.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vahdaneh and dextercioby
samalkhaiat said:
Try looking up the literatures on the Born-Infield theory for the (highly non-trivial) proof of the following identity (in 4 dimensions)
- \mbox{Det} \left( g_{\mu\nu} + F_{\mu\nu}\right) = -g \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2} g^{\mu\rho}g^{\nu\sigma}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\rho\sigma} - ( \frac{1}{8} \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\rho\sigma})^2 \right) , \ \ \ (1) where g = \mbox{Det} (g_{\alpha \beta}). Now, if that is your Lagrangian \mathcal{L}, then \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\alpha}A_{\beta})} = 2 \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial F_{\alpha \beta}} , and the equation of motion is just \partial_{\alpha} \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial F_{\alpha \beta}} \right) = 0. So, from the identity (1), you find \partial_{\alpha} \left( F^{\alpha \beta} - \frac{1}{4} \left( F_{\mu\nu} ~^*\!F^{\mu\nu} \right) ~^*\!F^{\alpha\beta}\right) = 0, where ~^*\!F^{\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}F_{\rho\sigma}.

You should have posted this in the Relativity forum.

i don't know why i haven't tried differentiating it when its written in form of field tensor!
so if I'm not wrong with my calculations(cause i got the hint from your advice but i couldn't follow the rest of yours and tried writing it down for myself again) in the end, with considering coulomb's gauge should i have the same equation of motion as Maxwell's Lagrangian?

p.s. and sorry for posting it here i just posted one at physics homework and no one replied so i cut it short to determinant problem and brought it up here, should/can i move it to another forum?
 
vahdaneh said:
so if I'm not wrong with my calculations(cause i got the hint from your advice but i couldn't follow the rest of yours and tried writing it down for myself again) in the end, with considering coulomb's gauge should i have the same equation of motion as Maxwell's Lagrangian?
Which part of my post you did not follow?
I cannot say a lot about your way of solving the problem because you did not show me it. But in any case, you do not need to impose any gauge. The Lagrangian \mathcal{L} = - \mbox{det} (g_{\mu\nu} + F_{\mu\nu}) describes a non-linear electrodynamics which tends to Maxwell’s theory in the weak field limit. As you can clearly see, when F is small, you can drop the cubic term \big[(F \ \cdot ~^*\!F)~^*\!F \big] from the equation of motion and obtain the Maxwell’s equation \partial_{\alpha}F^{\alpha \beta} = 0.

p.s. and sorry for posting it here i just posted one at physics homework and no one replied so i cut it short to determinant problem and brought it up here, should/can i move it to another forum?
Well, you would get better answers in the relativity section and, I believe, you can ask to be moved. I only saw your post by accident.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vahdaneh

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
898
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K