What is the relationship between physics field and force?

Click For Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between fields and forces, emphasizing that a field can exert a force on an object within it. While gravitational fields represent a force in classical physics, general relativity reinterprets gravity as a result of space-time geometry without a force. The concept of fields, developed by Faraday and formalized by Maxwell, marked a significant advancement in understanding physical interactions beyond the notion of "action at a distance." Fields are mathematical entities that can manifest as forces, but not all fields are force fields; for instance, only charged objects experience forces in electric and magnetic fields. Ultimately, the interaction between fields and objects is context-dependent, highlighting the complexity of physical phenomena.
qorizon
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Whenever there is a field there will be a force whenever the field interacts with an object placed in that field?

Is this always correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One thing that occurs to me in this regard is that gravity is a field in classical physics and involves a force, but in GR it's just a result of space-time geometry and no force.
 
Field is a mathematical object which has a value (scalar or vector) at every point in space (or some manifold).
 
qorizon said:
Whenever there is a field there will be a force whenever the field interacts with an object placed in that field?

Is this always correct?

It seems redundant but it was actually a real step forward in understanding when the concept of the field took hold. The story goes that Faraday had the intuition for fields and Maxwell made them mathematical. Prior to fields, forces were thought to "act at a distance," which was another way for saying that we didn't have a clue what was going on, but surely something. Taking the idea of fields seriously, by which I mean thinking of them as actual physical entities rather than mere mathematical abstractions, was a necessary step towards Maxwell's derivation of the self-propagating electromagnetic wave. There is just no way to talk about radiation if you only have the concept of force, and no fields. So while it may seem redundant for certain applications, it was a real step forward for our understanding of physics, the story goes.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
qorizon said:
Whenever there is a field there will be a force whenever the field interacts with an object placed in that field?

Is this always correct?
If the field is a force field then, pretty much by definition, if an appropriate object is placed in the field, there will be a force on it- but there are many kinds of fields other than "force" fields. The reason I say "appropriate" object is that there are many different kinds of force fields. Any object with mass will feel a force in a gravitational field but only an object with charge will feel a force in an electric field (and only a moving object, with charge, will feel a force in a magnetic field).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes phinds
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
17K