What is the significance of the Dirac equation in understanding antimatter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Haibara Ai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Haibara! :smile:

(have a gamma: γ and a mu: µ and a psi: ψ and try using the X2 and X2 tags just above the Reply box :wink:)

This is Dirac's equation for an electron (or any other spin-half particle), with hbar = c = 1 …

(iγµµ - m)ψ …

or, in full …

i(γ0∂ψ/∂x0 + γ1∂ψ/∂x1 + γ2∂ψ/∂x2 + γ3∂ψ/∂x3) = mψ

ψ is a 4-component vector, and the gammas are 4x4 matrices


Paul Dirac invented it around 1928, and used it to predict that the electron had an anti-particle (the positron, which is antimatter), which was discovered many years later. :smile:

For some more (but not very helpful :rolleyes:) detail, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac's_equation
 
here is a complete course in relativistic quantum mechanics

http://www.phys.uAlberta.ca/~gingrich/phys512/latex2html/node20.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tiny-tim said:
Hi Haibara! :smile:

(have a gamma: γ and a mu: µ and a psi: ψ and try using the X2 and X2 tags just above the Reply box :wink:)

This is Dirac's equation for an electron (or any other spin-half particle), with hbar = c = 1 …

(iγµµ - m)ψ …

or, in full …

i(γ0∂ψ/∂x0 + γ1∂ψ/∂x1 + γ2∂ψ/∂x2 + γ3∂ψ/∂x3) = mψ

ψ is a 4-component vector, and the gammas are 4x4 matrices


Paul Dirac invented it around 1928, and used it to predict that the electron had an anti-particle (the positron, which is antimatter), which was discovered many years later. :smile:

For some more (but not very helpful :rolleyes:) detail, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac's_equation


tiny tim i got a question, i am a beginner in physics but i have being reading about the hypothetical neutralino the particle that is say to be the dark matter particle and my doubt is the annihilations between tem caused by the weak force.Thank you very much for your help.
 
richard14 said:
tiny tim i got a question, i am a beginner in physics but i have being reading about the hypothetical neutralino the particle that is say to be the dark matter particle and my doubt is the annihilations between tem caused by the weak force.Thank you very much for your help.

erm :redface: … that's completely different …

please start a new thread :smile:
 
Thanks, that helped a lot!
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top