What is the solution to Problem A-6 in the 1997 Putnam Mathematical Competition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2016
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The solution to Problem A-6 from the 1997 Putnam Mathematical Competition involves defining a sequence \(x_k\) recursively with the formula \(x_{k+2}=\frac{cx_{k+1}-(n-k)x_k}{k+1}\), where \(x_0=0\) and \(x_1=1\). The value of \(c\) is determined as the largest value for which \(x_{n+1}=0\). The objective is to express \(x_k\) in terms of \(n\) and \(k\) for \(1 \leq k \leq n\). The solution is credited to Kiran Kedlaya and his associates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of recursive sequences
  • Familiarity with the Putnam Mathematical Competition format
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction techniques
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Research recursive sequence definitions and properties
  • Study solutions to previous Putnam Mathematical Competition problems
  • Learn about mathematical induction and its applications
  • Explore advanced algebraic techniques for sequence manipulation
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, competitive exam participants, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of recursive sequences and problem-solving strategies in mathematical competitions.

Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

For a positive integer $n$ and any real number $c$, define $x_k$ recursively by $x_0=0$, $x_1=1$, and for $k\geq 0$,
\[x_{k+2}=\frac{cx_{k+1}-(n-k)x_k}{k+1}.\]
Fix $n$ and then take $c$ to be the largest value for which $x_{n+1}=0$. Find $x_k$ in terms of $n$ and $k$, $1\leq k\leq n$.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Problem Of The Week # 232 - Sep 07, 2016

This was Problem A-6 in the 1997 William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition.

No one answered this week's POTW. The solution, attributed to Kiran Kedlaya and his associates, follows:

Clearly $x_{n+1}$ is a polynomial in $c$ of degree $n$, so it suffices to identify $n$ values of $c$ for which $x_{n+1} =0$. We claim these are $c = n-1-2r$ for $r=0,1,\dots, n-1$; in this case, $x_k$ is the coefficient of $t^{k-1}$ in the polynomial $f(t) = (1-t)^r (1+t)^{n-1-r}$. This can be verified by noticing that $f$ satisfies the differential equation
\[
\frac{f'(t)}{f(t)} = \frac{n-1-r}{1+t} - \frac{r}{1-t}
\]
(by logarithmic differentiation) or equivalently,
\begin{align*}
(1-t^2) f'(t) &= f(t) [(n-1-r)(1-t) - r(1+t)] \\
&= f(t) [(n-1-2r) - (n-1)t]
\end{align*}
and then taking the coefficient of $t^{k}$ on both sides:
$$
(k+1) x_{k+2} - (k-1) x_k =(n-1-2r) x_{k+1} - (n-1) x_{k}.
$$
In particular, the largest such $c$ is $n-1$, and $\displaystyle x_k =\binom{n-1}{k-1}$ for $k= 1, 2, \dots, n$.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K