MHB What is the solution to Problem B-4 in the 2000 Putnam Mathematical Competition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2017
Click For Summary
The problem involves a continuous function f(x) satisfying the equation f(2x^2-1) = 2xf(x) for all x. The goal is to demonstrate that f(x) equals zero for the interval -1 ≤ x ≤ 1. The solution, credited to Kiran Kedlaya and his associates, provides a rigorous approach to proving this assertion. Despite the complexity of the problem, no participants offered solutions during the discussion. The thread emphasizes the importance of engaging with mathematical challenges like those presented in the Putnam Competition.
Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

Let $f(x)$ be a continuous function such that $f(2x^2-1)=2xf(x)$ for all $x$. Show that $f(x)=0$ for $-1\leq x\leq 1$.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Problem Of The Week # 268 - Jun 20, 2017

This was Problem B-4 in the 2000 William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition.

No one answered this week's POTW. The solution, attributed to Kiran Kedlaya and his associates, follows:

For $t$ real and not a multiple of $\pi$, write $g(t) =\frac{f(\cos t)}{\sin t}$. Then $g(t+\pi) = g(t)$; furthermore, the given equation implies that
\[
g(2t) = \frac{f(2\cos^2 t - 1)}{\sin (2t)} =\frac{2(\cos t) f(\cos t)}{\sin(2t)} = g(t).
\]
In particular, for any integer $n$ and $k$, we have
\[
g(1+n\pi/2^k) = g(2^k + n\pi) = g(2^k) = g(1).
\]
Since $f$ is continuous, $g$ is continuous where it is defined; but the set $\{1+n\pi/2^k | n,k\in{\mathbb{Z}}\}$ is dense in the reals, and so $g$ must be constant on its domain. Since $g(-t) = -g(t)$ for all $t$, we must have $g(t) = 0$ when $t$ is not a multiple of $\pi$. Hence $f(x) = 0$ for $x \in (-1,1)$. Finally, setting $x=0$ and $x=1$ in the given equation yields $f(-1) = f(1) = 0$.
 

Similar threads