Undergrad What Made Einstein Accept the Expanding Universe Model?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mary Conrads Sanburn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Albert Einstein transitioned from a static universe model to an expanding universe model by 1931, influenced by key contemporaries such as Edwin Hubble, Alexander Friedman, and Georges Lemaître. Initially, Einstein's 1917 model, based on general relativity, required a cosmological constant to prevent gravitational collapse. Despite resistance to the expanding universe concept, Einstein's acceptance was solidified after discussions with leading astrophysicists and culminated in a collaboration with Willem de Sitter in 1932, proposing an eternally expanding universe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity principles
  • Familiarity with cosmological models and the cosmological constant
  • Knowledge of redshift and its significance in astronomy
  • Awareness of key figures in early 20th-century astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Edwin Hubble's observations and the implications of redshift
  • Study Alexander Friedman's contributions to cosmology
  • Explore Georges Lemaître's work on the expanding universe
  • Investigate the evolution of cosmological models post-1990s
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, historians of science, and students of cosmology seeking to understand the development of modern cosmological theories and the pivotal role of Einstein's work in this evolution.

Mary Conrads Sanburn
Messages
137
Reaction score
140
Einstein's conversion from a static to an expanding universe

Albert Einstein accepted the modern cosmological view that the universe is expanding long after his contemporaries

SPRINGER

Until 1931, physicist Albert Einstein believed that the universe was static. An urban legend attributes this change of perspective to when American astronomer Edwin Hubble showed Einstein his observations of redshift in the light emitted by far away nebulae--today known as galaxies. But the reality is more complex. The change in Einstein's viewpoint, in fact, resulted from a tortuous thought process. Now, in an article published in EPJ H, Harry Nussbaumer from the Institute of Astronomy at ETH Zurich, Switzerland, explains how Einstein changed his mind following many encounters with some of the most influential astrophysicists of his generation.

In 1917 Einstein applied his theory of general relativity in the universe, and suggested a model of a homogenous, static, spatially curved universe. However, this interpretation has one major problem: If gravitation was the only active force, his universe would collapse - an issue Einstein addressed by introducing the cosmological constant.

He then fiercely resisted the view that the universe was expanding, despite his contemporaries' suggestions that this was the case. For example, in 1922, Russian physicist Alexander Friedman showed that Einstein's equations were viable for dynamical worlds. And, in 1927, Georges Lemaître, a Belgian astrophysicist from the Catholic University of Louvain, concluded that the universe was expanding by combining general relativity with astronomical observations. Yet, Einstein still refused to abandon his static universe.

However, in an April 1931 report to the Prussian Academy of Sciences, Einstein finally adopted a model of an expanding universe. In 1932 he teamed up with the Dutch theoretical physicist and astronomer, Willem de Sitter, to propose an eternally expanding universe which became the cosmological model generally accepted until the middle of the 1990s. To Einstein's relief these two models no longer needed the cosmological constant.

###​

Reference:

H. Nussbaumer (2013), Einstein's conversion from his static to an expanding universe, European Physical Journal H, DOI 10.1140/epjh/e2013-40037-6

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-02/s-ecf021714.php
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there a question in there or did you just feel compelled to let us know all that?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
6K