What Prevents Electrons from Expanding Radially in White Dwarfs?

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkL
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
7 replies · 2K views
MarkL
Messages
34
Reaction score
2
From Wikipedia : White dwarfs resist gravitational collapse primarily through electron degeneracy pressure

What prevents electrons from expanding radially through the space between the ions (carbon, say)?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No, electromagnetism I think. If electrons were to migrate outwards the inner part would acquire a positive charge and the outer part a negative charge, which would rapidly become a very strong restoring force bringing back neutrality.

It is possible that you might find that there is a slight variation in local net charge with depth as various different effects push or pull slightly differently on different particles. I don't know for certain. You won't get a pure nucleon core withan electron atmosphere, though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and Drakkith
the answer above was: "restoring force bringing back neutrality"
Does this mean,
bring back (to neutrality) = zero electron expansion or prevents electron expansion
or
expand till (neutrality) = electrons expand till force equals fermi pressure = some electron expansion
 
MarkL said:
the answer above was: "restoring force bringing back neutrality"
Does this mean,
bring back (to neutrality) = zero electron expansion or prevents electron expansion
or
expand till (neutrality) = electrons expand till force equals fermi pressure = some electron expansion
As my last paragraph said:
Ibix said:
It is possible that you might find that there is a slight variation in local net charge with depth as various different effects push or pull slightly differently on different particles. I don't know for certain.
I'm not sure what question you are asking that isn't answered by that.
 
Your last paragraph would never influence an electron with enough pressure to support the mass of a star.
Your first paragraph, however, is spot on and intuitive.
And I'm good...thanks for your response.