What will my population be in 1,000 years?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter annab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    population Years
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating future population growth based on a starting population of 200 individuals, an average life expectancy of 35 years, and a yearly growth rate of 0.10. Participants emphasize the importance of defining assumptions regarding mortality rates and the distribution of life expectancy when predicting population changes over 1,000 years. Various scenarios are proposed, including immediate deaths, uniform death rates, and the implications of new entrants to the population. The consensus is that without clear assumptions, the calculations may not accurately reflect future population dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of population growth models
  • Familiarity with life expectancy and mortality rates
  • Basic knowledge of statistical distributions
  • Ability to interpret demographic assumptions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research demographic modeling techniques
  • Explore the implications of varying mortality rates on population projections
  • Learn about different statistical distributions relevant to life expectancy
  • Investigate the effects of immigration and birth rates on population growth
USEFUL FOR

Demographers, statisticians, and anyone interested in population studies and projections will benefit from this discussion.

annab
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If I have a starting population of 200 people with an average life expectancy of 35 and a yearly growth rate of .10, what will my population be in 1,000 years?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
annab said:
If I have a starting population of 200 people with an average life expectancy of 35 and a yearly growth rate of .10, what will my population be in 1,000 years?

Welcome to MHB!

Have you made any progress on the exercise? Anything in particular that you are struggling with?
 
annab said:
with an average life expectancy of 35
Could it be that the answer depends on how the survival time is assumed to be distributed?
 
Joppy

I haven’t made any progress on this problem, I don’t know where to start.

- - - Updated - - -

Krylov

I don’t understand, can you explain the possible distributions to me and show me how to do it?
 
annab said:
Joppy

I haven’t made any progress on this problem, I don’t know where to start.

- - - Updated - - -

Krylov

I don’t understand, can you explain the possible distributions to me and show me how to do it?

Hi annab! Welcome to MHB!

So we start with 200 people.
What will happen in the first year if no one dies?
That is, how many people will be born?
And how many people might we expect to die in the first year?
 
Average Lifetime of 35 years:
1) 1/2 die immediately and 1/2 die in 70 years.
2) Everyone lives exactly 35 years.
3) Deaths occur uniformly between 25 and 45 -- ~20 per year.
4) Infinitely many other possibilities.

We are told the ORIGINAL population has an average lifetime of 35 years. We are not told ANYTHING about those joining the group. If joining the group is defined as a birth process, it is very unlikely to support the assumption that new entrants have the same life expectancy as the original population.

More information or let's state the assumptions!
 
tkhunny said:
Average Lifetime of 35 years:
1) 1/2 die immediately and 1/2 die in 70 years.
2) Everyone lives exactly 35 years.
3) Deaths occur uniformly between 25 and 45 -- ~20 per year.
4) Infinitely many other possibilities.

We are told the ORIGINAL population has an average lifetime of 35 years. We are not told ANYTHING about those joining the group. If joining the group is defined as a birth process, it is very unlikely to support the assumption that new entrants have the same life expectancy as the original population.

More information or let's state the assumptions!

My interpretation: it just means that on average 1 person in 35 dies every year.
I believe the actual age distribution is not really relevant. And without information saying otherwise we should assume that the death rate is constant.
 
I like Serena said:
My interpretation: it just means that on average 1 person in 35 dies every year.
I believe the actual age distribution is not really relevant. And without information saying otherwise we should assume that the death rate is constant.
No objection. As long as we know its an ASSUMPTION. There is NOTHING in the problem statement that demands that it be so. We should also be careful not to conflate mortality rates with future life expectation. Since we are given expected future lifetime, we may have jumped a bridge inadvertently.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K