annab
- 2
- 0
If I have a starting population of 200 people with an average life expectancy of 35 and a yearly growth rate of .10, what will my population be in 1,000 years?
The discussion centers on calculating future population growth based on a starting population of 200 individuals, an average life expectancy of 35 years, and a yearly growth rate of 0.10. Participants emphasize the importance of defining assumptions regarding mortality rates and the distribution of life expectancy when predicting population changes over 1,000 years. Various scenarios are proposed, including immediate deaths, uniform death rates, and the implications of new entrants to the population. The consensus is that without clear assumptions, the calculations may not accurately reflect future population dynamics.
PREREQUISITESDemographers, statisticians, and anyone interested in population studies and projections will benefit from this discussion.
annab said:If I have a starting population of 200 people with an average life expectancy of 35 and a yearly growth rate of .10, what will my population be in 1,000 years?
Could it be that the answer depends on how the survival time is assumed to be distributed?annab said:with an average life expectancy of 35
annab said:Joppy
I haven’t made any progress on this problem, I don’t know where to start.
- - - Updated - - -
Krylov
I don’t understand, can you explain the possible distributions to me and show me how to do it?
tkhunny said:Average Lifetime of 35 years:
1) 1/2 die immediately and 1/2 die in 70 years.
2) Everyone lives exactly 35 years.
3) Deaths occur uniformly between 25 and 45 -- ~20 per year.
4) Infinitely many other possibilities.
We are told the ORIGINAL population has an average lifetime of 35 years. We are not told ANYTHING about those joining the group. If joining the group is defined as a birth process, it is very unlikely to support the assumption that new entrants have the same life expectancy as the original population.
More information or let's state the assumptions!
No objection. As long as we know its an ASSUMPTION. There is NOTHING in the problem statement that demands that it be so. We should also be careful not to conflate mortality rates with future life expectation. Since we are given expected future lifetime, we may have jumped a bridge inadvertently.I like Serena said:My interpretation: it just means that on average 1 person in 35 dies every year.
I believe the actual age distribution is not really relevant. And without information saying otherwise we should assume that the death rate is constant.