When is the ring of 2×2 matrices of the form [a -b; b a] a field?

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ishida52134
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
5 replies · 2K views
Ishida52134
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Let F be a field. R is an element of Mat(2,2)
[a -b
b a]
for a, b in F with matrix operations.
a. Show that R is a commutative ring with 1 and the set of diagonal matrices are
naturally isomorphic to F .
b. For which of the fields Q , R , C , F5
, F7
is R a field?
c. Characterize which elements of R have a multiplicative inverse.
d. Characterize the fields F for which R will be a fi eld.
e. For which Fp
( p prime) is R a field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks like an entire homework problem.
So where do you get stuck? What have you tried already?
 
Just wanted to confirm my answer.only F2 would be a prime subfield such that R is a field right?

There's just one problem I can't figure out. Give examples of fields F such that
f is isomorphic to f(t) where f(t) is the set of formal fractions.

And just one more thing. How would you show Q[sqrt2 sqrt3] is a field? I'm having trouble showing multiplicative inverse.

Thanks
 
If you want to "confirm an answer", then tell us what your answer is!
 
inverse element for field a + bsqrt(2) + c(sqrt(3)

Yes there is an inverse element, you just have to work at it a little. Let's say your element is a + b√2 + c√3 and you want to show that 1/( a + b√2 + c√3) is in the field. As a first step multiply top and bottom of that fraction by a + b√2 - c√3 giving you

( a + b√2 + c√3)/((a + b√2)[itex]^2[/itex] +3c[itex]^{2}[/itex])

the denominator becomes a[itex]^{2}[/itex] + 2b[itex]^{2}[/itex] +3c[itex]^{2}[/itex] + ab√2.

Now multiply numerator and denominator by
a[itex]^{2}[/itex] + 2b[itex]^{2}[/itex] +3c[itex]^{2}[/itex] - ab√2

Your denominator will be all real and the numerator will have various terms that can be simplified down to something in your field.
 
Last edited:
For some reason the answer up above got placed in this topic. But it was the answer to another question. I wonder if I managed to actually do this, or is there a bug somewhere?