MHB Where is the mistake in this formal proof?

  • Thread starter Thread starter solakis1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mistake Proof
solakis1
Messages
407
Reaction score
0
we have the following formal proof:

i) $$\forall x[\forall y(xy=y)\Longrightarrow x=1]$$.......theoren in real Nos

2)$$\forall y(xy=y)\Longrightarrow x=1$$......1,U.E ,x=x

3) $$(x0=0)\Longrightarrow x=1$$...... 2,U.E ,y=0

4)$$\forall A[A.0=0]$$........Theorem in Real Nos5) )$$[x.0=0]$$........4,U.E, A=x

6) x=1........3,5 M.Ponens

7) )$$\forall A[A=1]$$........ 6,U.I

U.E=Universal Elimination

U.I = Universal Introduction

I am afraid to say i find no mistake
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The very first line is wrong, it should be:

1) $\forall x[\forall (y \neq 0): (xy = y ) \implies x = 1]$

One can see that your statement is clearly untrue by letting:

$x = 2, y = 0$

so it is not a theorem of the real numbers.

(Moral of the story: don't go proving stupid things by dividing by 0).
 
Deveno said:
The very first line is wrong, it should be:

1) $\forall x[\forall (y \neq 0): (xy = y ) \implies x = 1]$

One can see that your statement is clearly untrue by letting:

$x = 2, y = 0$

so it is not a theorem of the real numbers.

(Moral of the story: don't go proving stupid things by dividing by 0).
1)$$\forall y(xy=y)$$.......hypothesis

2)$$ (x1=1)$$.........1,U.E ,Y=1

3)$$\forall A[A.1=A]$$.......Axiom in Real Nos

4))$$ [x1=x]$$.......3,U.E,A=x

5) x=1........Substituting ( 4) into (2)

6)$$\forall y(xy=y)\Longrightarrow x=1$$....... From (1) to (5) by using the rule of conditional proof

7)$$\forall x[\forall y(xy=y)\Longrightarrow x=1]$$..........6,U.I

Where is the mistake
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top