Who are the Scientists Behind Groundbreaking Discoveries?

  • Thread starter Thread starter drx eng
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying prominent scientists featured in a group photo, with a focus on their contributions to various fields within STEM. Participants reference historical figures and their significance in disciplines such as physics, astronomy, and computing.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants recognize various scientists in the photo, including Max Planck, Niels Bohr, Albert Einstein, and Marie Curie.
  • One participant highlights the representation of women in historical STEM teams, mentioning figures like Henrietta Swan Leavitt and Ada Lovelace.
  • There is uncertainty regarding the identification of individuals in the third row, with suggestions including Pauling, Yukawa, and possibly Thompson or Rutherford.
  • Multiple participants express similar thoughts on the difficulty of identifying all individuals, with some confirming each other's guesses.
  • One participant comments on the perceived decline in undergraduate education quality as reflected in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the identification of several key scientists, but there remains uncertainty and disagreement regarding some individuals in the photo, particularly in the third row.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about specific identities and the historical context of the figures discussed, indicating a reliance on visual recognition rather than definitive knowledge.

drx eng
Who are they?
images (1).jpeg
 
Science news on Phys.org
drx eng said:
Who are they?
I recognize one of them. Do I get a prize?

2nd down on the left...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, atyy and Vanadium 50
I recognize the photos but the question reminds me of recent threads with group photos of STEM teams from previous centuries where one woman appears surrounded by men.

If Astronomy, "Identify Henrietta Swan Leavitt".
If radiation Physics, "Point out Marie Curie".
If history of computing, "Find Ada Lovelace."

There are examples from many other disciplines if the point requires more emphasis.
 
Max Planck, Niels Bohr
Albert Einstein, Paul Dirac
? - I can't identify anyone in the 3rd row
Erwin Schroedinger, Marie Curie, Wolfgang Pauli
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
Third row Pauling, Yukawa and ? I think
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
jedishrfu said:
Third row Pauling, Yukawa and Thompson I think
Possibly, I thought third row third photo was Ernest Rutherford.
1588726054389.png


This photo is younger and clearer:
1588726229346.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Yup you got it, I was just about to post that too. I kept circling around with Thompson, Compton, Eddington... and completely forgot Rutherford.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy and Klystron
jedishrfu said:
Yup you got it, I was just about to post that too. I kept circling around with Thompson, Compton, Eddington... and completely forgot Rutherford.
Yes, I thought Thompson first, which brought me to Rutherford. Certainly both contributed so much.
I also like the old lab gear in the McGill University Rutherford photo.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu and atyy
atyy said:
Max Planck, Niels Bohr
Albert Einstein, Paul Dirac
? - I can't identify anyone in the 3rd row
Erwin Schroedinger, Marie Curie, Wolfgang Pauli
Exactly the same with me.
 
  • #10
So we got Planck, Bohr, Einstein, Dirac, Pauling, Rutherford, Schroedinger, Curie and Pauli.

Ok, Thanks everyone
:)
 
  • #11
berkeman said:
I recognize one of them. Do I get a prize?

2nd down on the left...
I couldn't sleep, because of this book cover. But now I'm free. So I hope that's the same prize for you.
 
  • #12
Planck, Bohr, Einstein, Dirac, Pauling, Yukawa, Rutherford, Schroedinger, Curie and Pauli.

Forgot to put Yukawa.
 
  • #13
The question reflects the low state of UG education.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
552
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K