Why Aren't There Public Intellectuals From The Field of Natural Sciences?

  • Thread starter realism877
  • Start date
  • #1
80
0
Most public intellectuals who are critics of society and speak out about their knowledge often come from the social science realm. Why aren't there any from the hard sciences?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Ryan_m_b
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
5,844
711
You mean like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins" [Broken]?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Ryan_m_b
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
5,844
711
  • #5
22,089
3,286
Einstein was a pacifist and strived for more peaceful methods. So he's also one, I think. Grothendieck was a die-hard pacifist too...
 
  • #6
80
0
Einstein was a pacifist and strived for more peaceful methods. So he's also one, I think. Grothendieck was a die-hard pacifist too...

Yes, Einstein fits the criteria for an intellectual. What about Buckminster Fuller?
 
  • #7
Ryan_m_b
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
5,844
711
So have we established that the OP is resolved now?
 
  • #8
80
0
So have we established that the OP is resolved now?

I'm just saying that we need more.
 
  • #9
Evo
Mentor
23,153
2,778
I'm just saying that we need more.
Why? Just because they work in a certain field doesn't mean their thoughts on things outside of their field have any meaning.
 
  • #10
918
16
That's all we need is another Kaku.
 
  • #11
34
0
I don't think "public intellectuals" are really important. I mean what's the point?
 
  • #12
Ryan_m_b
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
5,844
711
I don't think "public intellectuals" are really important. I mean what's the point?
To allow the public to feel and be involved in the important intellectual fields that are so important for their country. When media individuals, politicians and businesses are debating issues like alternative medicine, creationism in schools etc it's important to have intellectual individuals and groups that can engage the public on these issues and be trusted so that they can make an informed decision.

It's naive to think that the public should or would accept the faceless announcements of people they have never met on issues that haven't been explained.
 
  • #13
Evo
Mentor
23,153
2,778
To allow the public to feel and be involved in the important intellectual fields that are so important for their country. When media individuals, politicians and businesses are debating issues like alternative medicine, creationism in schools etc it's important to have intellectual individuals and groups that can engage the public on these issues and be trusted so that they can make an informed decision.

It's naive to think that the public should or would accept the faceless announcements of people they have never met on issues that haven't been explained.
The problem is that the general public wouldn't recognize any of these scientists unless they were a "pop" scientist like kaku, and even then, the majority of the public would not recognize him or his name.
 

Related Threads on Why Aren't There Public Intellectuals From The Field of Natural Sciences?

Replies
55
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • Last Post
7
Replies
156
Views
14K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Top