Why Avoid Depicting Only Hands or Feet in Icons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter honestrosewater
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Designing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reasons for avoiding the depiction of only hands or feet in icons, exploring cultural sensitivities and potential offensiveness in design choices. It touches on the implications of iconography in various cultural contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references guidelines suggesting the avoidance of icons depicting only hands or feet, questioning the rationale behind this recommendation.
  • Another participant proposes that cultural sensitivities, particularly in Islamic and Arabic contexts, may explain the avoidance, noting that certain gestures involving hands and feet can be considered offensive.
  • A later reply expresses skepticism about the idea that gestures could be offensive to one culture while acceptable to another, questioning the implications of such cultural sensitivity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of avoiding hand and foot depictions in icons, with some supporting the idea based on cultural sensitivity and others challenging the notion of cultural offensiveness.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of cultural interpretations and the potential for misunderstanding in design practices, but does not resolve the underlying disagreements about cultural sensitivity.

honestrosewater
Gold Member
Messages
2,133
Reaction score
6
I was just reading the http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/" closes with a list of some common things to avoid:
  • Pictures of flags or money
  • Maps showing political boundaries or contentious location names
  • Lists of countries or cities in non-alphabetical order (unless specifically requested or required by the context)
  • Icons depicting animals
  • Icons depicting only hands or feet
Does anyone know the reason behind the last one? Why and to whom might depicting only hands or feet be offensive or suggest something probably unintended? I can't think of anything.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
As I understand it, Islam forbids any iconography (including images of Mohammed), which is why Moslem art and architecture is characterized by geometric designs and scrolls. That would account for the avoidance of animal icons, which is not what you asked, but I mention it because I think what's really being suggested is that designers should be sensitive to the Arabic culture.

Which brings me to your question. Arabs can be very offended by body language involving hands and especially feet in ways that might seem harmless to others. For instance, it is considered impolite to point the sole of your foot or shoe at another person. So just to be on the safe side, it might be best to avoid any depictions of hands or feet.

That's all I can think of.

(Of course, there are many non-Arab Moslems as well)
 
Last edited:
Ah, right. That makes sense. I'll have to read more about that now. Thanks! :smile:
 
honestrosewater said:
Ah, right. That makes sense. I'll have to read more about that now. Thanks! :smile:

This thread is so wrong, why should some gesture be insufferable to one race,
and acceptable to another? are we as the (human race) so narrow minded,
if we can not call a spade a spade how the heck will we ever communicate without hostility.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K