Why Can We See Venus from Michigan?

  • Thread starter dmayers94
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Venus
In summary, the conversation discusses the visibility of Venus in the night sky and why it is possible to see it even though it is closer to the sun than Earth. The concept of phases and how they are dependent on the position of the observer is also explored, with a comparison between inner and outer planets. It is concluded that all planets have phases, but their visibility depends on the observer's position and reference point.
  • #1
dmayers94
16
0
I was looking at the sky last night, and I saw Venus to the west, really high in the sky. It was brighter than any star that night. Why am I able to see it? It seems like, since we are on the side of the Earth facing opposite the sun at night, I should be able to only see the planets that are further away from the sun than the earth. Can someone explain why I'm thinking about this the wrong way? Thanks. (I live in Michigan by the way, in case that information is needed)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #3
Find a ball and mark a spot on it. Then hold it up to a light. The dot represents your position on the Earth. Rotate the ball around until the spot just crosses the line between light and dark. As you will see the side of the ball the spot is on is not facing away from the light, it is facing perpindicular to it. This is why we can see inner planets when they are on the right places in their orbits relative to us and the Sun.
 
  • #4
If you're exactly at the opposite side of the Earth as the sun, (at midnight, near the equator) it will indeed be inpossible to see anything that is closer to the sun than the earth.
If the sun is only 10 degrees below the horizon, you will be able to see objects at an angle of 10 degrees or more away from the sun.
 
  • #5
Outer planets can be apparently 100% illuminated from reflected sunlight. Inner planets that undergo phases and varying separations from the Sun are a different matter.
 
  • #6
Objects not to scale, red=light, the black line is how you can see the venus.

attachment.php?attachmentid=45878&d=1333546088.jpg
 

Attachments

  • earthvenus.jpg
    earthvenus.jpg
    7.8 KB · Views: 6,746
  • #7
Depends on where Venus is in relation to the sun and to earth.
 
  • #8
We can also see a crescent moon, even though it is closer to the sun than we are during crescent phases.
 
  • #9
Can someone explain why venus has phases, but no other planets do? Every planet is orbiting the sun, shouldn't every planet have a phase relative to earth? Mercury, Mars etc..
 
  • #10
Flustered said:
Can someone explain why venus has phases, but no other planets do? Every planet is orbiting the sun, shouldn't every planet have a phase relative to earth? Mercury, Mars etc..

Mercury has phases too. Mercury and Venus share a common trait having to do with their location relative to Earth.

All other planets (Mars Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, Uranus) share a common trait having to do with their location relative to Earth.

Can you think what these traits are? (Mercury/Venus) versus (Mars/Jupiter/Saturn/Neptune/Uranus)?
 
  • #11
DaveC426913 said:
Mercury has phases too. Mercury and Venus share a common trait having to do with their location relative to Earth.

All other planets (Mars Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, Uranus) share a common trait having to do with their location relative to Earth.

Can you think what these traits are? (Mercury/Venus) versus (Mars/Jupiter/Saturn/Neptune/Uranus)?

Well Mars should also have a phases. Just longer more played out phases. Just because Mars is farther out than Earth, doesn't mean it can't have a phase.
 
  • #12
Flustered said:
Well Mars should also have a phases. Just longer more played out phases. Just because Mars is farther out than Earth, doesn't mean it can't have a phase.

Actually yeah it kind of does mean that Mars can't have a phase other than full or just slightly less than full. I'd encourage you to try and draw it out.
 
  • #13
Also, the farther out the planet, the closer it is to just always being at full phase. If you think about it, if the planet is far enough away, then the way it appears from Earth is really no different than the way it appears from the sun, from whose point of view that planet definitely appears always illuminated.
 
  • #14
cepheid said:
Also, the farther out the planet, the closer it is to just always being at full phase. If you think about it, if the planet is far enough away, then the way it appears from Earth is really no different than the way it appears from the sun, from whose point of view that planet definitely appears always illuminated.

But if you were to fly closer to Mars at a 90 degree angle relative to the sun and mars. It would be phasing.
 
  • #15
Flustered said:
But if you were to fly closer to Mars at a 90 degree angle relative to the sun and mars. It would be phasing.

Sure, but we are talking about seeing the planets from Earth.
 
  • #16
So outer planets do not appear to phase from Earth. But in reality they do, since they have day and night.
 
  • #17
If you look hard enough, you can indeed see phases for the outer planets - just a limited set of them.
 
  • #18
Flustered said:
So outer planets do not appear to phase from Earth. But in reality they do, since they have day and night.

Let's be clear. All planets have day and night sides, that is an objective reality. But phases are a geometry thing, relating the position of the observer with the Sun and the planet.

So there is no objective "reality" to phases - it is intimately tied with an observational reference point.
 

Attachments

  • phases.png
    phases.png
    3.9 KB · Views: 1,389
Last edited:
  • #19
russ_watters said:
If you look hard enough, you can indeed see phases for the outer planets - just a limited set of them.

(Yeah. I got shouted down in a thread earlier by someone when I claimed that outer planets have phases. :grumpy: :tongue:)
 
  • #20
It is safe to say that all planets phase than correct? Wether us observers on Earth can see it or not. Outer planets do phase to a certain point in space time.
 
  • #21
Flustered said:
It is safe to say that all planets phase than correct? Wether us observers on Earth can see it or not. Outer planets do phase to a certain point in space time.

Please reread post 18. (I've added some art.)

Phases are the result of an observer's geometry. No reference point from which it's observed = no phasing effect.

(Compare to other relative properties of things, such as velocity or orientation. A cube is floating in intergalactic space. Is it right side up, or upsidedown? Facing forward or sideways? The questions have no meaning without an observer deciding what 'up' and 'forward' are. Orientation is relative to the observer.)
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Flustered said:
So outer planets do not appear to phase from Earth. But in reality they do, since they have day and night.

Phases are unrelated to day/night cycles. As seen from Venus, the Earth would not show phases, from Mars it would.

Russ when you say that outer planets have phases, as seen from earth, you need be clear that they are always, full or very nearly full. I can image that we may be able to see a small slice of the backside (wrt the sun) when at max elongation. But this will be a pretty small effect.
 
Last edited:
  • #23
Integral said:
Russ when you say that outer planets have phases, as seen from earth, you need be clear that they are always, full or very nearly full. I can image that we may be able to see a small slice of the backside (wrt the sun) when at max elongation. But this will be a pretty small effect.

I tried to make this point as well. The least illuminated that an outer planet can get is gibbous. At least according to Wikipedia, Mars can get down to having only 87% of the surface appearing illuminated when at quadrature (which I assume means that the sun, Earth and Mars form a right angle). More distant planets would be even fuller than this...always.
 
  • #24
Integral said:
Phases are unrelated to day/night cycles. As seen from Venus, the Earth would not show phases, from Mars it would.



Russ when you say that outer planets have phases, as seen from earth, you need be clear that they are always, full or very nearly full. I can image that we may be able to see a small slice of the backside (wrt the sun) when at max elongation. But this will be a pretty small effect.

Sure it is, you see the phases because you are seeing the line, that separates, dark/light = Day/ Night. Unless phases are something different?



DaveC426913 said:
Please reread post 18. (I've added some art.)

Phases are the result of an observer's geometry. No reference point from which it's observed = no phasing effect.

(Compare to other relative properties of things, such as velocity or orientation. A cube is floating in intergalactic space. Is it right side up, or upsidedown? Facing forward or sideways? The questions have no meaning without an observer deciding what 'up' and 'forward' are. Orientation is relative to the observer.)

Come on don't give me that mumbo jumbo. Regardless if we can observe it or not, that does not mean it is not happening. Tree falls in the wood, no around to hear it, does it make a sound? Of course it does.

Just because we cannot observe it doesn't mean it is not taking place. We didn't observe the big bang, but it happened right?

P.S. How come Earth appears to phases vertically (opposite) of how we see the Moon Phase.. Also if we never went to the Moon to watch the Earth (phase) does that mean the Earth doesn't phases if no one observed it?
 
  • #25
Integral said:
Russ when you say that outer planets have phases, as seen from earth, you need be clear that they are always, full or very nearly full. I can image that we may be able to see a small slice of the backside (wrt the sun) when at max elongation. But this will be a pretty small effect.
Indeed, but this fact is the answer to a pretty common question I've gotten about some of my photos: "why isn't it round?" The effect is very noticeable even for a slight loss of illuminated area.
 
  • #26
Flustered said:
Come on don't give me that mumbo jumbo. Regardless if we can observe it or not, that does not mean it is not happening. Tree falls in the wood, no around to hear it, does it make a sound? Of course it does.
:grumpy: I went to great lengths to avoid the very kind of faulty analogy.

Is the cube in intergalactic space oriented "upwards"? Upwards is a term that, by definition, is relative to some other reference point. Without a second reference point, 'up' has zero meaning.So, to be clearer in the phases explanation, remove the word observer. Replace it with external reference point. Now:

A phase is an angle (New, Crescent, Half, Gibbous or Full - or 0 through 360 degrees).

An angle occurs between two intersecting lines. If you only have a single straight line (say, the line of Sun > Mars), there is no angle; it does not exist. Only by introducing an external reference point do you have an angle (Sun > Mars > ref point). Only then is it meaningful to talk about New, Crescent, Half, Gibbous or Full or any degree in between.

A phase is a direct property of exactly three points. There must be three.

See?
 
Last edited:
  • #27
Dave I understand what you are saying. If there is no reference point, or second line, there cannot be a phase.

I can't grasp why you cannot understand what I'm saying, because it makes perfect sense to me.

Even though we cannot see a phase on Mars, if we went closer to Mars in a spaceship and made a right triangle with Mars being the 90 degree point. We would see a phase, meaning the phase is there.

Hence
If someone observed Mars (phasing)
This means Mars phases.
Mars is an outer planet.
Therefor outer Planets go through phases weather we observe or not.
 
  • #28
Flustered said:
I can't grasp why you cannot understand what I'm saying, because it makes perfect sense to me.
I think everybody understands what you are saying -- everything in the solar system that is illuminated by the sun will have a dark side and a light side. But in this discussion, the thought process has been how things appear when observed from Earth. If you use the term "phase" without a certain observing point in mind, it doesn't really mean anything; everything is half lit and half unlit all the time, that doesn't change.
 
  • #29
Flustered said:
Dave I understand what you are saying. If there is no reference point, or second line, there cannot be a phase.

I can't grasp why you cannot understand what I'm saying, because it makes perfect sense to me.

Even though we cannot see a phase on Mars, if we went closer to Mars in a spaceship and made a right triangle with Mars being the 90 degree point. We would see a phase, meaning the phase is there.

Hence
If someone observed Mars (phasing)
This means Mars phases.
Mars is an outer planet.
Therefor outer Planets go through phases weather we observe or not.

yes but no one EVER talks about phases unless they mean from the point of view of the Earth.

There is literally NO REASON to talk about planetary phases unless you are talking about them from the point of view of the Earth. Maybe someday there will be people who look at other planets and see the phases differently, or maybe you can read about it in a sci fi book

But for actual discussions in astronomy it is entirely irrelevant.
 
  • #30
Flustered said:
Dave I understand what you are saying. If there is no reference point, or second line, there cannot be a phase.

I can't grasp why you cannot understand what I'm saying, because it makes perfect sense to me.
I do understand what you are saying. But you just contradicted it by agreeing with me, here:
Flustered said:
Dave I understand what you are saying. If there is no reference point, or second line, there cannot be a phase.
 
  • #31
SHISHKABOB said:
yes but no one EVER talks about phases unless they mean from the point of view of the Earth.

There is literally NO REASON to talk about planetary phases unless you are talking about them from the point of view of the Earth. Maybe someday there will be people who look at other planets and see the phases differently, or maybe you can read about it in a sci fi book

But for actual discussions in astronomy it is entirely irrelevant.
Actually, the only time anyone ever talks about phases is whenever and wherever they have a point of observation. Most times that is on Earth.

But there is plenty of talk about the phases of Earth from a PoV on the Moon, and of Saturn from the PoV of space probe flybys.

http://Earth'sky.org/space/what-does-earth-look-like-from-the-moon [Broken]

http://www.astrotulsa.com/learn/lesson2.asp (At bottom)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #32
DaveC426913 said:
Actually, the only time anyone ever talks about phases is whenever and wherever they have a point of observation. Most times that is on Earth.

But there is plenty of talk about the phases of Earth from a PoV on the Moon, and of Saturn from the PoV of space probe flybys.

http://Earth'sky.org/space/what-does-earth-look-like-from-the-moon [Broken]

http://www.astrotulsa.com/learn/lesson2.asp (At bottom)

right, I stand corrected
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #33
Flustered said:
So outer planets do not appear to phase from Earth. But in reality they do, since they have day and night.

Phases are only relevant to an observer on another celestial body. The day/night cycle on the body itself is all an observer on the body would notice. A bit like a rainbow - it's only observed because of relative positioning and isn't inherent to raindrops, storms or even sunlight.
 
  • #34
qraal said:
Phases are only relevant to an observer on another celestial body. The day/night cycle on the body itself is all an observer on the body would notice. A bit like a rainbow - it's only observed because of relative positioning and isn't inherent to raindrops, storms or even sunlight.

Well, not really. We're getting some pretty heavy and pointed counter-arguments, so I want to be sure it's clear.

1] Phases are only relevant to an observer at an external viewpoint. The viewpoint could be anywhere in space. (Though it must be somewhere.)

2] It is not like a rainbow. A rainbow exists whether there is an observer or not. The rays of light coming from a rainbow really are coloured along that path. Whether a rock is in its path or whether nothing but vacuum is in its path, those photons have a frequency and a trajectory.

This is qualitatively different from a phase, which is a property of an angle. An angle requires three points, as does the phase.

A better analogy, as I mentioned, is the orientation of an object. The object has no "up" unless a point of reference is defined.
 
  • #35
So technically there is no north and south pole. All the pictures of Earth showing the north pole as the (top) are wrong. In Reality the south pole could be the (top) correct?
 
<h2>1. Why is Venus visible from Michigan?</h2><p>Venus is visible from Michigan because it is one of the brightest objects in the night sky, second only to the Moon. It is also one of the closest planets to Earth, making it easier to see with the naked eye.</p><h2>2. Is Venus always visible from Michigan?</h2><p>No, Venus is not always visible from Michigan. Its visibility depends on its position in its orbit around the Sun and its alignment with Earth. It can be seen at certain times of the year, typically in the morning or evening sky.</p><h2>3. How far away is Venus from Michigan?</h2><p>The distance between Venus and Michigan varies depending on their positions in their respective orbits. On average, Venus is about 25 million miles away from Michigan.</p><h2>4. Why does Venus appear brighter than other stars in the sky?</h2><p>Venus appears brighter than other stars in the sky because of its thick atmosphere, which reflects and scatters sunlight, making it appear much brighter. It is also closer to Earth than other stars, making it appear larger and more prominent.</p><h2>5. Can I see Venus during the day from Michigan?</h2><p>Yes, it is possible to see Venus during the day from Michigan, although it may be more difficult due to the brightness of the sun. It is best to look for Venus during the morning or evening when the sun is not as bright and Venus is more visible in the sky.</p>

1. Why is Venus visible from Michigan?

Venus is visible from Michigan because it is one of the brightest objects in the night sky, second only to the Moon. It is also one of the closest planets to Earth, making it easier to see with the naked eye.

2. Is Venus always visible from Michigan?

No, Venus is not always visible from Michigan. Its visibility depends on its position in its orbit around the Sun and its alignment with Earth. It can be seen at certain times of the year, typically in the morning or evening sky.

3. How far away is Venus from Michigan?

The distance between Venus and Michigan varies depending on their positions in their respective orbits. On average, Venus is about 25 million miles away from Michigan.

4. Why does Venus appear brighter than other stars in the sky?

Venus appears brighter than other stars in the sky because of its thick atmosphere, which reflects and scatters sunlight, making it appear much brighter. It is also closer to Earth than other stars, making it appear larger and more prominent.

5. Can I see Venus during the day from Michigan?

Yes, it is possible to see Venus during the day from Michigan, although it may be more difficult due to the brightness of the sun. It is best to look for Venus during the morning or evening when the sun is not as bright and Venus is more visible in the sky.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
967
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
26
Views
2K
Back
Top